My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-14-2011 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2011 Packets
>
04-14-2011 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 12:44:24 PM
Creation date
9/1/2017 10:59:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
4/14/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />January 13, 2011 <br />Page 7 <br />X271 include that the past several meetings have run long, agenda items are being tabled in order to <br />272 end meetings late in the evening and it is believed that with 15 Commissioners, some <br />273 commissioners may not be getting a fair amount of time to discuss items. Commissioner <br />274 Gunderson asked for discussion to include the opinion of Commissioners on meeting more often. <br />275 <br />276 Commissioner Drennen believes that if Commissioners self -police discussions, stay on topic and <br />277 if meetings are run more efficiently, more meetings would not be needed. Commissioner <br />278 Sutherland concurs and added that the Commission has the ability to call special meeting when <br />279 needed. <br />280 <br />281 Commissioner Turcotte believes that the last three meetings are running long because of <br />282 discussions about Roberts Rules of Order procedures. <br />283 <br />284 Commissioner Trehus concurs with Commissioner Turcotte and also states that the past three <br />285 meetings have been irregularly different than past history. <br />286 <br />287 Commissioner Sutherland stated that she her discussion about Roberts Rules of Order lead to a <br />288 long debate at the last meeting. <br />289 <br />290 MOTION by Commissioner Storberg, seconded by Commissioner Penn, to call for roll call vote <br />291 on whether to have more regular meetings per year. Commissioner Sutherland states that the roll <br />call motion is non -debatable and the motion to call for a roll call does not need to be passed. The <br />293 action is then taken. <br />294 <br />295 Voting yes: Aldentaler, Gunderson. Voting no: Sutherland, Penn, Storberg, Williams, Carlson, <br />296 Lyden, Trehus, Drennen. No opinion: Turcotte. <br />297 <br />298 Commissioner Gunderson stated for the record the roll call vote is the opinion of Commissioners <br />299 present, that there are Commissioners absent. <br />300 <br />301 The results are 2 Yes, 8 No and 1 No opinion. <br />302 <br />303 Commissioner Turcotte asked to further discuss the issue. <br />304 <br />305 Commissioner Sutherland said that the call for a roll call vote kills debate on the issue. <br />306 Commission Trehus states that he believes that correct, but objects to the end of discussion in a <br />307 procedural move of one Commissioner. More research is needed on Roberts Rules of Order for <br />308 the Commission to all have the same knowledge. <br />309 <br />310 Commissioner Penn stated she believed her seconding was for discussion. <br />311 <br />312 Commissioner Storberg stated she understood that the roll call vote would end discussion. If the <br />313 majority of Commissioners were not open to the idea of more meetings, then discussion of the <br />#....-314 topic should end. She also concurs with Commissioner Trehus that the Commission is currently <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.