My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-13-2011 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2011 Packets
>
10-13-2011 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 12:58:55 PM
Creation date
9/1/2017 11:19:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
10/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 6, 2011 <br />APPROVED <br />136 The council requested that the Charter Commission Chair and Vice chair be invited to <br />137 attend the public hearing on the amendments. <br />138 <br />139 4. Discuss Current Conservation Water Rate Structure — The mayor noted that he <br />140 requested a discussion about the City's water rate structure. He recalled that the council <br />141 previously received a study on water rates, was asked to change the rate structure and did <br />142 so. However the impetus of the change was to impact use and he doesn't believe that has <br />143 happened. He still has a concern; Lino Lakes is a family oriented community and the new <br />144 rate structure seems to punish families. He suggests that a plan that encourages water <br />145 conservation is a better way to address the situation. <br />146 <br />147 City Engineer Wedel explained that in 2008 the Minnesota Department of Natural <br />148 Resources required a tiered rate structure in order for the City to keep its authority to <br />149 continue with new wells. The idea at that time wasn't to penalize families but to get at <br />150 the "big irrigators". There is benefit to the city in conservation because infrastructure <br />151 costs can be avoided (much infrastructure is built to serve peak times). Is the new tiered <br />152 rate structure working? He suggested that it is difficult to say since this has been a year <br />153 of lots of rain and the economy is down. He provided a chart indicating rate variations in <br />154 other cities — he doesn't think the City is out of line with other communities. Tim <br />155 Hillesheim, Utilities Supervisor for the City, explained that he doesn't think that families <br />156 are punished by the rates because 95% of the city's residential water users consume <br />157 30,000 or less (remaining in the lower rate). He added that the city has not been able to <br />''`e 158 see the result of the rate change because the past two summers have been wet. Mr. <br />159 Wedel remarked that the city could certainly review the rate structure in 2012 if that's the <br />160 council's desire. Public Service Director DeGardner distributed additional information <br />161 indicating that over 99% of Lino Lakes' families fall within the first two tiers (lowest) of <br />162 the rate structure in the winter and that 82% of Lino Lakes families fall within the first <br />163 two tiers in the summer. The city is doing what it can to keep from having to add more <br />164 very expensive infrastructure that will in fact raise rates. <br />165 <br />166 The mayor thanked staff for the discussion. He'd like to take a look at the rate structure <br />167 again in 2012 to ensure fairness. <br />168 <br />169 5. Comprehensive Plan Update — Community Development Director Grochala <br />170 recalled that in May of 2011 the council gave preliminary approval to the 2030 <br />171 Comprehensive Plan and it was approved by the Metropolitan Council with authorization <br />172 to put the Plan into effect. At this point it is back to the council for final Plan approval. <br />173 He has attempted, in his staff report, to identify the major changes to the Plan over the <br />174 past few years, including decreasing the amount of units forecast in the next twenty years, <br />175 reduction of the affordable housing goal, and modifications to the utility staging plan by <br />176 dividing the staging areas into five year phases. In addition the council modified the Plan <br />177 to reintroduce an annual average new housing growth benchmark, limit city financial <br />178 assistance to meet regional housing goals, modify residential development densities and <br />�..� 179 reduce net residential density proposed. When the Plan is approved as final by the <br />180 council, staff will begin the process of updating the city's official controls such as the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.