Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission <br />July 12, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br />46 Motion passes with Commissioners Bartsch, Helgemoe, and Trehus abstaining <br />47 MOTION by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Gunderson, to approve the <br />48 minutes from October 14, 2010. <br />49 Motion passes with Commissioners Bartsch, and Helgemoe, abstaining <br />50 MOTION by Commissioner Sutherland, seconded by Commissioner Dahl, to approve the <br />51 minutes as amended from January 12, 2012. <br />52 Motion passes with Commissioner Penn abstaining <br />53 MOTION by Commissioner Sutherland, seconded by Commissioner Turcotte, to approve the <br />54 minutes as amended from April 12, 2012. <br />55 Motion passes with Commissioner Penn abstaining <br />56 MOTION by Commissioner Dahl, seconded by Commissioner Turcotte, to approve the minutes <br />57 as amended from May 31, 2012. <br />58 Motion passes with Commissioner Turcotte abstaining <br />59 <br />60 <br />61 UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />62 <br />63 Vice Chair Dahl indicated that Item 6B Charter Amendments on Ballot this fall was placed on <br />64 the agenda in case there was additional input required. <br />65 Commissioner Storberg asked if the Commission will be notified if the language proposed by the <br />66 Commission is going to be changed on the ballot. <br />67 <br />68 MOTION by Commissioner Sutherland, seconded by Commissioner Bretoi, to have the Chair <br />69 and Vice Chair follow up on the status of the ballot language for the two proposed Charter <br />70 Commission amendments. <br />71 Motion carried unanimously. <br />72 On Item 6C Council response to Tax Exempt Zones by Ordinance, Vice Chair Dahl commented <br />73 she had checked with the City Clerk who indicated there had been no response from the Council. <br />74 <br />75 On Item 6D the Council proposed amendment to Chapter 8 public improvements. An e-mail <br />76 from the City Clerk was received by the Chair stating there was no support for additions to the <br />77 Commission budget to provide for a review of the proposed amendments. <br />78 Considerable discussion ensued with Commissioner Sutherland noting that after listening to a <br />79 recording of the Council work session she is questioning why the Council appears not to have an <br />80 accurate picture of the Commission's budget and asked what has been provided to them. <br />81 Commissioner Trehus noted that the June 24th letter to Council provided the relevant supporting <br />82 detail. Chair Lyden reminded the Commissioners that it is the Council's prerogative to make <br />83 funding decisions. <br />84 Some more recently appointed Commissioners expressed concern about the genuine willingness <br />85 of the Council to support the work of the Commission through the provision of adequate funding. <br />86 Several Commissioners with longer service provided their perspective on the work of the <br />87 Commission and the Commission's challenges in working with the Council <br />88 <br />2 <br />