Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />put on the agenda for the next work session. Comm. Sutherland stated that even the amount that <br />had been agreed to have been paid has not yet been paid. In our out standing bill, $107.30, was in <br />agreement to be paid and has not. The $1,570.35, is due to our need to respond to the audit <br />initiated by the city council. Mayor Reinert said the $107.30 portion of the bill would be paid. <br />Mayor Reinert was informed that the Five Year Plan, as per Section 7.05 of the Lino Lakes <br />Charter, for years 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 has not been passed. Mayor Reinert will <br />also try to set the schedule so as to have the joint meeting of the council and commission at our <br />regularly scheduled July 8th 2010 meeting. Having concluded his response to the commission, <br />Mayor Reinert left the meeting at this point. The commission thanked him for being present. <br />6. C Budget, Five year plan, and Dougherty bill to Lino Lakes for council authorized audit <br />of the Charter Commission. <br />Five Year Plan has not been adopted. The Commission read the copies of the bills presented by <br />Dougherty's law firm to the city of Lino Lakes for the council requested <br />Investigation / Audit of the Charter Commission. As per the bills sent the city has paid <br />$9,289.00 to the Dougherty firm for their charter investigation <br />6. D Annual letter to the Judge for 2009 <br />Commission liked the draft letter as amended, with an explanation of the council ordered audit, <br />and that the council had not adopted the Five Year Plan beginning in 2009, as per Section 7.05 of <br />the charter. Motion to approve the letter with amendments was made by Commissioner Trehus <br />and seconded by Commissioner Minar. Motion Passed. <br />6. E Code of conduct Report <br />Commissioner Sutherland would like to know where the Commission stands on this issue before <br />more time is spent on a new code. The response from the commission was mostly favorable. It <br />was suggested that it would be put on the agenda for our joint meeting in July, that the code <br />would include the council, city staff, and boards, and that a conflict of interest section be <br />prominent in the code. Motion was made by Commissioner Sutherland and seconded by <br />Commissioner Drennen that we include the code of conduct in our July 8th joint meeting. Motion <br />passed with Commissioner Storberg voting no. <br />6. F Tax Cap Amendment <br />Commissioner Trehus said that if we plan to have this (the tax cap amendment) on Fall ballot we <br />are going to have to get this started. Commissioner Sutherland stated we should get this on the <br />agenda with the council. Commissioner Minar agreed now would be the time to get started. <br />Commissioner Sutherland said that if this were presented to the council now they would <br />probably agree to share. Commissioner Carlson suggested that we could also present this as an <br />amendment by ordinance. There were also suggestions that it go right to a referendum, timing <br />being an issue. It was decided we will look at the three options from other cities; this wilt be <br />discussed at a special meeting in June so we would be able to present this at the joint meeting in <br />July. June 3`d at 6:30 is the date and time set for the special meeting to discuss the amendment. <br />