My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-14-2010 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2010 Packets
>
10-14-2010 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 1:38:26 PM
Creation date
9/1/2017 1:51:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
10/14/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
JT CITY COUNCIL/CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING July 8, 2010 <br />APPROVED <br />180 <br />181 Commissioner Minar noted that he has seen city employee salary information that <br />182 indicates there is a problem; the salaries are too high and there are people who would do <br />183 the jobs for less. Public employees should not be making more than their private sector <br />184 counterparts. Regarding road maintenance, it can be funded properly within a reasonably <br />185 reduced budget. <br />186 <br />187 Council Member O'Donnell suggested that staff could be hired at a lower salary but the <br />188 full picture includes consideration of what staff brings to the city, i.e. the city's high bond <br />189 rating saves the city lots of money. Regarding the subject at hand, a tax levy, he doesn't <br />190 have a problem seeing it considered if that is a goal of the commission and it is best for <br />191 the citizens. <br />192 <br />193 Commissioner Gunderson suggested that the commission's goal isn't necessarily to go <br />194 out with a referendum on the question. The goal is to make sure there's a cap when the <br />195 state's levy limit requirement expires to protect the taxpayers of the city. <br />196 <br />197 There was discussion between the council and commissioners about the city's obligations <br />198 related to the Legacy at Woods Edge area and the possibility of an impact on city taxes. <br />199 <br />200 Chair Dahl thanked the council for input on this item indicated that the commission will <br />201 keep the matter (tax cap) on their agenda. <br />202 <br />`-� 203 New Business <br />204 <br />205 A. Road Improvements — How do we get there? (Council initiated agenda item) <br />206 1 a. Joint Subcommittee (Council initiated agenda item) <br />207 <br />208 Mayor Reinert asked if the commission feels that there is a problem with current process <br />209 for reconstructing roads. He noted that there has been one road reconstructed in the last <br />210 twenty years but information would seem to indicate that while it's not an emergency, <br />211 more work is needed. There have been failed referendums. He is interested in hearing <br />212 the commission's viewpoint and any suggestions. <br />213 <br />214 Commissioner Turcotte noted that he has reviewed the city's Pavement Management Plan <br />215 and would like an explanation of the city's maintenance program. Community <br />216 Development Director Grochala explained the city's current program of sealcoating and <br />217 overlay, noting that there are streets in the city that are past the point where either of those <br />218 processes would be helpful. <br />219 <br />220 Council Member O'Donnell noted that it is good that the city has a pavement <br />221 management plan but bad that it hasn't been fully funded (although full funding is in <br />222 place again recently). In regard to the work that was done in the past (by the citizens task <br />223 force) to address the matter of reconstructing the city's roads, he'd like to leverage that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.