My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-17-2008 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2008 Packets
>
01-17-2008 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2021 3:09:42 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 9:44:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
1/17/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5-1--f "i b k.k. CGS a r te. Co w rn s s o.v <br />1-1-7—ZOOS' <br />LEGAL MEMORANDUM <br />Note: This Memorandum contains legal advice between an attorney and <br />client, and should not be distributed to or shared with any third parties. <br />TO: CHAIR OF THE LINO LAKES CHARTER COMMISSION <br />FROM: KAREN E. MARTY, ATTORNEY AT LAW <br />DATE: January 11, 2008 <br />Question: If the city council ignores the statutory timeline for submitting a charter amendment to <br />the voters, does it face liability? What may a charter commission do to assure that the charter <br />amendment is timely submitted to the voters? <br />The statute does not specify a penalty, and there are no cases on point. Generally, when a charter <br />amendment is presented to a city, and a city fails to submit it to the voters, the presenter then files <br />a mandamus lawsuit, to force the city official to place the matter on the next general election (or, <br />if the deadlines for the general election have passed or are too far away, to call a special election <br />to decide the matter). There does not appear to be a specific penalty imposed on any city official <br />who fails to properly schedule an election. <br />Does the Charter Commission want this matter addressed soon? If so, it should bring the <br />statutory deadlines to the attention of the city officials. A tactful way of doing this would be to <br />send the city clerk a letter: <br />Thank you for sending me a copy of the Work Session Staff Report regarding the <br />Charter Amendment Process. I am pleased to see that the City Council will be <br />considering this matter in the near future. However, I am confused by the dates listed. <br />Under Minn. Stat. Sec. 410.12, Subd. 5, once the Charter Commission has <br />reviewed a proposed amendment submitted by the City Council, the City Council is to <br />hold an election on either its proposed amendment or the substitute amendment "in the <br />same manner as provided in subdivision 4". Under Minn. Stat. Sec. 410.12, Subd. 4, <br />"Amendments shall be submitted to the qualified voters at a general or special election <br />and published as in the case of the original charter." Election provisions for an original <br />charter are specified in Minn. Stat. Sec. 410.10, Subd. 1, which states: "Upon delivery of <br />such draft, the council or other governing body of the city shall cause the proposed <br />• <br />charter to be submitted at the next general election thereafter occurring in the city within <br />six months after the delivery of such draft, and if there is no general city election <br />occurring in the city within six months after the delivery of such draft, then the council or <br />other governing body of the city shall cause the proposed charter to be submitted at a <br />special election to be held within 90 days after the delivery of such draft." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.