Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission <br />April 17, 2008 <br />Page 7 <br />DRAFT <br />264 Chair Duffy advised that it may be an option to ask staff to come and explain and stated that <br />265 another option would be to propose some questions and send them to staff to see what kind of <br />266 response they get first. <br />267 <br />268 Commissioner Storberg thought that they should put forth the options and take a vote to see it the <br />269 Commission wants to accept the changes to the amendment to deny them. <br />270 <br />271 Commissioner Bretoi questioned what the likeyhood of the Commission submitting their own <br />272 proposal on the charter on the ballot. <br />273 <br />274 Commissioner Zastrow advised that they do not want to accept the changes that the Council has <br />275 proposed and stated that they could either submit their own changes or leave the existing charter <br />276 as is. <br />277 <br />278 Chair Duffy advised that they have until May 24th to approve the City Council amendment. She <br />279 advised that they could then either look at continuing with the amendment that the Commission <br />280 submitted last December or they could withdraw that and start new to submit their own <br />281 amendment again. <br />282 <br />283 Commissioner Zastrow thought that their previous amendment was the best that they would get <br />"'\ 284 it. He suggested rejecting the Council amendement and letting them put it on the ballot. He <br />285 advised that they could then advertise against it and thought that they could knock the <br />286 amendment down with advertising. <br />287 <br />288 Commissioner Gunderson stated that she had been following this in the papers and was just as <br />289 confused as most other citizens in the city. She did not believe that the Commission could spend <br />290 public funds to advertise either way on a ballot amendment. <br />291 <br />292 Commissioner Storberg advised that the City Council could advertise in the newsletter. <br />293 <br />294 Commissioner Trehus advised that the Council did already spend public funds to advertise on the <br />295 referendum. He stated that the Council could argue that they did not spend $25,000 to tell the <br />296 citizens that the charter costs the citizens millions of dollars. <br />297 <br />298 Commisioner Carlson advised that from the information they received from their attorney they <br />299 could educate the public and believed that things would get stretched out of proportion. <br />300 <br />301 Chair Duffy advised that it might be helpful to get information on multiple ballot questions. She <br />302 questioned how confusing the Commission wanted to make this issue. She advised that the <br />303 either proposal would need 51 percent of the vote to pass. <br />304 <br />305 Commissioner Lyden advised that the game was going to be played whether the Commissioner <br />306 played or not and thought that it would be better to have a good defense rather than offense. He <br />307 stated that if they could stop the amendment from the City Council it would be more important <br />