My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-22-2008 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2008 Packets
>
05-22-2008 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:34:29 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 10:18:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
5/22/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Charter Commission <br />April 17, 2008 <br />Page 9 <br />DRAFT <br />351 cannot more forward with anything on this matter until they Charter Commission makes their <br />352 decision or exhausts their timeframes. <br />353 <br />354 Commissioner Trehus advised that their attorney has offered to draft the ballot language for their <br />355 amendment and thought their might be a small chance that the City would approve the language <br />356 once submitted. <br />357 <br />358 Commissioner Lyden thought that it might be easier to defeat the amendment from the Council <br />359 by not submitting anything. <br />360 <br />361 Commissioner Drennen thought the best idea would be to put out their own amendment to take <br />362 votes away from the Council's. He advised that it neither amendment received enough votes, the <br />363 charter would remain the same. <br />364 <br />365 Commissioner Gunderson advised that she spoke with a member of the Mounds View Charter <br />366 Commission who recently passed an amendment change. She thought it might be helpful to <br />367 research other cities that had recenly passed an amendment. She advised that it could show them <br />368 the format and language that had been used. <br />369 <br />370 Commissioner Trehus advised that the League of Minnesota Cities might be the place to get that <br />"\ 371 information and then request copies of the ballots for the next meeting. <br />372 <br />373 Commissioner Bretoi thought it would be interesting to find multiple options and how things <br />374 were put on the ballot including the rules and tactics. <br />375 <br />376 Commissioner Trehus thought that the Commission should be clear that this was not going to <br />377 backfire. He did not think that they had enough information tonight to determine that. He <br />378 thought that the idea of researching the ballots was a good idea. <br />379 <br />380 Commissioner Bretoi questioned if it would not be a better idea to hold off on approving or <br />381 denying the amendment from the Council until they get their information. He advised that <br />382 obviously they do not like the amendment proposed from the Council and questioned what the <br />383 best strategy would be for the Commission at this point. <br />384 <br />385 Commissioner Trehus advised that might be a good idea to investigate and not make the decision <br />386 tonight. <br />387 <br />388 Commissioner Storberg advised that if they reject the amendment from the Council they are still <br />389 going to put it on the ballot and advised that their only option then would be to add their own <br />390 question or leave it. <br />391 <br />392 Chair Duffy advised that if they reject the amendment tonight it would stop their clock. <br />393 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.