My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-22-2008 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2008 Packets
>
05-22-2008 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:34:29 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 10:18:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
5/22/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'`,„ Excerpt from April 21, 2008 e-mail to Charter Commissioner: <br />I received a call from .Anoka County a few minutes ago about my question about how <br />the Charter Commission would go about putting an amendment question on the <br />ballot this fall. She indicated that we would need to follow whatever normal process <br />the city has established, which means going through the City Council, however, she <br />was very adamant that the City Council MUST authorize putting our amendment on <br />the ballot, so it's not a question of "if' for us or them. She also said that the council <br />CANNOT change the ballot language that we put forward and she suggested <br />working with the city attorney, or our own if we have one, to get the ballot language <br />worked out. I asked her about the actual language of the question itself, i.e. <br />approving the changes to Chapter 8 of the Charter with one question vs. spelling out <br />each section and subdivision change with multiple questions. She indicated that if <br />we had multiple questions that they would most likely have to have a second ballot, <br />which was not a popular idea and gets very messy. She suggested keeping the <br />question as simple as possible because if the question(s) are too lengthy, the voters <br />will just vote "no" or they won't vote on the questions at all. If the ballot question is <br />simple, the response is generally better. She was very helpful overall and said that if <br />we have a dispute with City Hall over the ballot question that we can always call <br />Anoka County for assistance, which was good to know. She is very aware of the <br />politics that are involved with these sorts of issues. <br />That's all for now. <br />Take care, <br />Cori <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.