My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09-10-2008 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2008 Packets
>
09-10-2008 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:38:20 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 10:58:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
9/10/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CHARTERED <br />470 US Bank Plaza <br />200 South Sixth Street <br />Minneapolis MN 55402 <br />(612) 337-9300 telephone <br />(612) 337-9310 fax <br />http://www.kennedy-graven.com <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Gordon Heitke, City Administrator <br />FROM: Stephen Bubul <br />DATE: September 4, 2008 <br />RE: Charter Amendment Ballot <br />Accompanying this memo is the proposed resolution calling an election and setting the <br />ballot form, for an amendment to the City Charter as petitioned by voters. At the <br />September 2, 2008 work session, the Council directed me to prepare the ballot in a way <br />that identified the amendment as being initiated by petition, and also to expand on the <br />ballot question itself. <br />I have prepared the ballot (included within the resolution) with three options for the ballot <br />question: <br />Option A is the language from the prior draft reviewed on September 3, which <br />simply states the text of the amendment. <br />Option B describes the text, indicating that the amendment would change <br />assessment procedures from the separate procedures under the charter to the procedures <br />under Chapter 429. <br />Option C is similar to Option B, except that it highlights two features of the <br />existing charter that would change—the referendum and the veto by affected owners. <br />My recommendation is that the ballot should include either Option A or B. The difficulty <br />with Option C is that the ballot singles out two particular features of the existing charter <br />without explaining any of the alternative features under Chapter 429. Also, by selecting <br />just these features (which are admittedly significant and controversial), the Council might <br />viewed as making a statement about what is most important, rather than letting voters <br />investigate the entire amendment and make their own decision on that point. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.