Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission APPROVED <br />January 17, 2008 <br />X72 Commissioner Bening expressed his view that in being a Charter Commission member he does <br />173 not give up his individual rights as a citizen of Lino Lakes to present his feelings and beliefs. He <br />174 does not believe it undermines the Charter. Nothing in the Charter says anything against what he <br />175 did by speaking to the City Council. He stated he had brought up many times in Commission <br />176 meetings that he did not agree on most of the things the Commission was changing, the heart of <br />177 it in Sections 8.05 through 8.09. He had spoken about that at different times and had sent an <br />178 email to the Chairperson on November 18th specifically outlining many different things. He <br />179 agrees it was short notice and that is one thing he apologizes for, but he had discussed it at other <br />180 meetings. He felt as a citizen of Lino Lakes he had the right to speak to the City Council and staff <br />181 and present what he considered would be an alternative. <br />182 <br />183 There was considerable discussion by the commission members regarding Commissioner <br />184 Bening's presentation to the City Council. The following concerns were expressed: <br />185 • Commissioner Bening should have resigned from the Charter Commission prior to <br />186 presenting his viewpoints to the City Council. <br />187 • Commission members have the right to present their viewpoints to the City Council if <br />188 they present themselves as a citizen, and not as a member of the Charter Commission. <br />189 • A member of the Charter Commission must separate their personal views and represent <br />190 the residents of Lino Lakes. <br />191 • The final vote was taken at the November Commission meeting on what would be <br />192 presented to the City Council. <br />193 <br />94 MOTION by Commissioner Storberg, seconded by Commissioner Stockman Maher, to move on <br />195 in the agenda. <br />196 <br />197 The following additional concerns were noted: <br />198 • Commissioner Bening disrespected the fellow commissioners. <br />199 • If the City Council accepts Commissioner Bening's amendment there will be additional <br />200 costs, as well as more time required from staff and legal attorneys. <br />201 • The Commission does not always agree but they should work as a team. <br />202 • Commissioner Bening should have informed the Commission he would be presenting an <br />203 amendment to the City Council. <br />204 <br />205 Commissioner Bening stated he did not mean to be disrespectful to anyone on the Commission. <br />206 He wanted to be public and upfront about it. He noted that the press was there and interviewed <br />207 him, and there will most likely be information in the Citizen and the Quad. <br />208 <br />209 Chair Duffy stated she received a call from the Quad wanting to do an article on this. She <br />210 expressed concern that there is a rift between what the Council and the Charter Commission <br />211 want. Now there will be a third option out there, which will add to more confusion for the <br />212 citizenry. <br />213 <br />214 Motion carried unanimously. <br />,215 <br />5 <br />