My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01-11-2007 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter
>
Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Packets
>
2007 Packets
>
01-11-2007 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:43:01 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 11:33:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
1/11/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Memorandum <br />Date: January 4, 2007 <br />To: Charter Commission Chairperson Warren and Commissioners <br />From: Gordon Heitke <br />Re: Meeting Request <br />As requested in Chairperson Warren's e-mail of Tuesday, the subsequent memo related <br />to road reconstruction and requesting staff to be present at the January 11, 2007 Charter <br />Commission meeting was distributed to the Council at their January 3 work session <br />meeting. The Council reacted very positively to the suggestions contained in the memo <br />and complimented Chairperson Warren on initiating this communication. The Council, <br />however, is proposing an alternative approach to addressing the issues raised in the <br />memo. <br />First, the issue of "whether the Commission and the City are able to develop a process <br />and plan together..." is something that will need to be determined by the Commission <br />and the Council. The staff will carry out whatever directive they receive from the <br />Council. <br />In response to the points in the memo regarding "better understanding the pitfalls of our <br />current process", receiving input on "where the process gets bogged down", "ideas...for <br />overcoming these gateways", and "where we might improve the process", the Council <br />and staff agree that Mr. Grochala and Mr. Studenski are not the most appropriate resource <br />persons to address these issues. Mr. Studenski's involvement in road reconstruction is <br />limited to the design and engineering aspects of the improvements and Mr. Grochala <br />carries out the directives of the city's bond counsel. Due to the complexity of the <br />interrelationship of the present charter provisions and statutes, and ambiguities within the <br />charter, the city's bond counsel interprets the charter and advises staff on all charter - <br />related activities. <br />Therefore, the Council feels that a more appropriate and effective approach to addressing <br />the intent of the memo is to have the Council members involved and to have the city's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.