My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-12-2007 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2007 Packets
>
04-12-2007 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2022 9:34:56 AM
Creation date
9/8/2017 11:50:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
4/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
warning device. First, I suggest that a warning should be placed anywhere there is a hidden <br />condition from the motorist. And second, the city based on available resources (i.e., money and <br />employees), should establish in their policy what streets or conditions will receive warnings, <br />perhaps only the streets rated as poor in you pavement management plan. In addition, the city <br />may wish to pay special attention to areas involving complaints or accidents. The city's policy <br />should have procedures for responding to notice of complaints and accidents. If the city <br />ultimately decides that no action is necessary, the city should at least document the situation to <br />show that it followed its policy. <br />I hope that the above information adequately answers your questions. If you need additional <br />information, please let me know. <br />Christopher Smith <br />Risk Management Attorney <br />League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust <br />(651) 281-1269 <br />csmith(a�lmnc.orq <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.