Laserfiche WebLink
League of Minnesota Cities <br />145 University Avenue West, St, Paul, MN 55103-2044 <br />(651) 281-1200 • (800) 925-1122 <br />Fax (651) 281-1299 • TDD: (651) 281-1290 <br />www.lmnc.org <br />May 10, 2007 <br />Citizen Task Force <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />600 Town Center Pkwy <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 <br />Re: Uniqueness of the special assessments referendum in Lino Lakes' charter <br />Dear Citizen Task Force: <br />Following my visit to Lino Lakes to present information on charters, I received a question from a <br />member of the Citizen Task. Force, as well as the administrator, Gordon Heitke. The question was, do <br />any other charter cities in Minnesota have a similar pension s'ion requmng a referendum on special <br />assessments as found in the Lino Lakes Charter. <br />The answer is that no other charter city in Minnesota has a charter provision requiring a referendum <br />an special assessments. <br />Section 8.04, isitn 2 ofthe Lino Lakes charter reads, in part~ <br />[W}hen less than one hundred (100%) percent of the estimated cost of the proposed <br />improvement is to be paidfor <br />wpm vby special assessments, connection charges, or any outside <br />funding source otherthan the City general fund, fl e. Council shall within one hundred twenty <br />(120) days alter the conclusion of the public hearing submit the e, . o e sed local improvement <br />and its assessment formula to the voters of the city.:... If a majority of those voting > on said <br />improvement and associated assessment formula are opposed, the Council shall not proceed <br />with the local improvement as proposed. <br />(emphasis added.) <br />Comparing this charter provision with the corresponding special assessment and local improvement <br />provisions of other charter cities, I have found no other city which has a similar mandatory <br />referendum in its charter. The closest charter to Lino Lakes in this respect is foundin Mounds View. <br />In Mounds View, the charter outlines a similar procedure for council to follow, yet its analogous <br />subdivision 2 reads, in part: <br />[W]hen less than 100 percent of the estimated cost of a proposed local improvement is to be <br />paid for by special assessment, within the sixty day period after a public hearing has been held <br />on the proposed improvement, a petition may be filed with Council, signed by a majority of <br />the number of electors who voted for Mayor in the last regular election, protesting against <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER <br />-15- <br />