My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-14-2007 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2007 Packets
>
06-14-2007 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 5:52:30 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 12:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
6/14/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
That language is very broad, and clearly includes activities (e.g "maintaining pavement") <br />that could reasonably be called "repairs." <br />2. Is a project to grade and resurface a road an improvement under <br />Section 429.021 subd. 1(1)? <br />Yes, for the reasons stated above. <br />3. Is it accurate to say that, under Chapter 429 and the Charter, an <br />improvement can only be assessed if the improvement increases the value of the <br />property being assessed? <br />Yes. The test for all assessments is whether the market value of the assessed property is <br />increased by at least the principal amount of the assessment. <br />4. Could a city specially assess properties for the cost of replacing street <br />lamps and covers? <br />Yes, under Section 429.021, Subdivision 1 (4), which authorizes a city "maintain" street <br />lights and street lighting systems. In practice, it may be difficult to prove the increase in <br />market value for that type of work. However, it is difficult to make blanket statements, <br />and each project must be evaluated based on all the facts. In practice, assessments for <br />this type of work are not common, but that is different from concluding that they <br />impossible or illegal in all circumstances. <br />5. Could the owners along a road be specially assessed for the cost of <br />replacing the driving surface of the road? <br />Yes; see answer to Question -No. 1. Again, how -much of the -costs- could. be assessed is a <br />separate question, and will depend on the facts of each case. <br />6. Does installing brighter street lights, adding curbs, installing a <br />different road surface, or adding sewer and water turn a simple "repair" into an <br />"improvement." <br />No. Chapter 429 does not require that the "improvement" result in a change in the <br />existing infrastructure. Changes and "add-ons" may increase the amount of assessment, <br />as increase in market value might be easier to prove. But as noted above, maintenance <br />costs might also increase the market value of benefited property. <br />7. If a new road is installed to serve a new development, does the City <br />Charter call for the benefited owners to pay for that improvement? <br />The charter itself doesn't require than any improvement be specially assessed. It simply <br />states if an improvement is assessed, the procedures in Chapter 8 must be followed. A <br />city might decide to finance a new road from other sources (state aid for example). It is <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.