Laserfiche WebLink
League of Minnesota cores <br />145 University Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55303-2044 <br />(651) 283-1200 • (800) 925-1122 <br />Fax (651) 281-1299 • TDD: (651) 281-1290 <br />www.imnc.org <br />May 10, 2007 <br />Citizen Task Force <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />600 Town Center Pkwy <br />Lino Lakes, MN 55014-1182 <br />Re: Uniqueness ofthe special assessments referendum in Lino Lakes' charter <br />Dear Citizen Task Foy <br />Following my visit to Lino Lakes to present information on charters, 1 received a question from a <br />member of the Citizen Task Force, as well as the administrator, Gordon Heitke. The question was, do <br />any other charter cities in eta have a similar provision requiring a referendum on special <br />assessments as found in the Lino Lakes Charter. <br />The answer is that no other charter city in Minnesota has a charter provision requiring a referendum <br />On special as. <br />Section 8.04, subdivision 2 of tate Lino Lakes charter reads, in part: <br />[Willis less than one hundred (100%) pe cent of the estimated cost of the proposed <br />improvement is to be paid for by special assessments, .connection charges, or any outside <br />funding source other than the City general fund, the Council shall within one hundred twenty <br />(120) days atter the conclusion of the public hearing submit the proposed local improvement <br />and its assent formula to the voters of the city.... If a majority of those voting on said <br />improves and associated assessment formula are opposed, the Council shall not proceed <br />with the local improvement as proposed. <br />(emphasis added.) <br />Comparing this charter provision with the corresponding special assessment and local improvement <br />provisions of other charter cities, 1 have found no other city which has a similar mandatory <br />referendum in its charter. The closest charter to Lino Lakes in this respect is found in Mounds View. <br />In Mounds View, the charber outlines a similar procedure for council to follow, yet its analogous <br />subdivision 2 reads, in part <br />Millen less than K0 percent of the estimated cost of a proposed local improvement is to be <br />paid for by special assessment, within the sixty day period after a public hearing has been held <br />on the pry improvement, a petition may be filed with Cecil, signed by a majority of <br />the number of electors who voted for Marx in the last regular election, protesting against <br />Mi EQUAL OPPQRRUNITY(AFf1RMATiVE •ACii9R EMPLOYER <br />