Laserfiche WebLink
Charter Commission <br />January 11, 2007 <br />Page 3 <br />Not approved by Charter Commission (1-17-2008) <br />Commissioner Bor stated that it was not the position of City Staff to provide the <br />information to assess if an amendment was necessary. Chair Warren responded he was <br />speaking for Council and Staff. She believed they should work with the Commission, <br />even if the request for specific City staff was ineffective. A joint meeting might help <br />define what could and could not be done. <br />Commissioner Trehus expressed concern they should allow access to City staff, and <br />should not direct the Commission to training. He believed it was hindering the process. <br />Commissioner Bening asked for clarification. Commissioner Trehus answered that the <br />Commission requested information and was denied. The people holding the <br />neighborhood surveys knew the issues. <br />Commissioner Duffy indicated the intent of the Commission was to see if there was a <br />viable alternative. She directed the Commission to a note from William Hawkins and <br />Associates dated April 12, 2005 and addressed to the City Administrator referring to <br />Minnesota Statute 410. <br />Chair Warren noted the possibility that the Commission might not be inviting enough <br />people or the right people. She wanted to involve the people who would move it forward. <br />She recommended the item also be discussed at the next meeting. At the July meeting, <br />the Commission would draft an amendment and have it ready for the vote. <br />Commissioner Bor questioned if the letter gave any assurance that something could be in <br />place. <br />Commissioner Storberg inquired if any progress had been made since the last meeting. <br />She believed it should be initiated to benefit the roads and recommended tabling the issue <br />to allow Council and Staff to approach the Commission. <br />Commissioner Vacha agreed that the issue should be tabled. Commissioner Carlson <br />concurred, stating that Council should be motivating the Commission to act. <br />Chair Warren stated that Council could make an amendment that might not serve the <br />community. Commissioner Trehus responded he did not believe that Council was trying <br />to work with the Commission. If the Commission did not go forth with the issue, the <br />amendment concern did not automatically rest. He noted the City Administrator <br />indicated that Council would decide. He was willing to go to a training session. <br />Commissioner Storberg reminded the Commission of the stadium example. <br />MOTION by Commissioner Storberg, seconded by Commissioner Rosemary Williams, <br />to table any further discussion on road construction to be opened at the time of the <br />Commission's choice. Motion carried unanimously. <br />