My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04-11-2013 Charter Packet (2)
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2013 Packets
>
04-11-2013 Charter Packet (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2021 5:26:12 PM
Creation date
9/15/2017 9:32:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
4/11/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROCESS <br />City Council <br />proposes project. <br />OR <br />Citizens petition <br />for project. <br />City completes report on <br />improvements which <br />includes project scope, <br />cost and proposed <br />assessments. <br />1 <br />City Council calls for <br />Public Hearing; staff <br />notifies affected <br />property owners by mail <br />and citizens by published <br />legal notice. <br />Affected property <br />owners can submit <br />written objection <br />to the project. <br />City Council holds <br />PUBLIC HEARING for <br />public comment. <br />Was written <br />objection received <br />by more than 50% <br />of affected <br />property owners <br />prior to or at the <br />YES <br />Council calls for 2nd <br />Hearing to be held at <br />least 45 days after the <br />1st hearing. Staff <br />notifies affected <br />property owners by mall <br />and citizens by published <br />CITY ACTION <br />NO <br />City Council holds 2nd <br />PUBLIC HEARING to take <br />additional testimony, <br />hear concerns, work out <br />differences and revise <br />project, if necessary. <br />FESIDENTON <br />The Council can order <br />the project with or <br />without amendments <br />based on public <br />comment, without <br />increasing the project <br />scope. <br />The Counc I can order <br />the project with or <br />without amendments <br />based on public <br />comment, without <br />increasing the project <br />scope. Staff notifies <br />affected property <br />Citizens can petition to <br />request a vote on the <br />improvement project. <br />Affected property <br />owners can submit <br />written objection to <br />the project. <br />Was a petition <br />received by more <br />than 12% of residents <br />who voted in the last <br />local election within <br />30 days of ordering <br />YES <br />Project goes to Public <br />Election. 51% of <br />voters must approve <br />the project or it is <br />stopped. <br />7 71 <br />r. NO <br />Was written <br />objection received by <br />more than 50% of <br />affected property <br />owners within 30 <br />days of ordering the <br />YES <br />Project moves <br />forward. <br />City Council stops the <br />project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.