My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11-05-2012 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2012
>
11-05-2012 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2014 11:54:30 AM
Creation date
3/7/2013 10:40:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/05/2012
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 5,2012 <br /> APPROVED <br /> CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : November 5,2012 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 9:05 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell, <br /> 8 Rafferty, Roeser(arrived at 5:45 p.m.) and <br /> 9 Mayor Reinert <br /> 10 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Finance Director Al Rolek; <br /> 13 Public Safety Director John Swenson; City Engineer Jason Wedel; Community <br /> 14 Development Director Michael Grochala; Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; City <br /> 15 Clerk Julie Bartell <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Agenda <br /> 18 <br /> 19 2. Five Year Financial Plan—Administrator Karlson recalled that the council reviewed <br /> 20 a draft Five-Year Financial Plan back in August and, at that time, postponed <br /> 21 consideration because the Charter Commission was proposing a tax cap that would have <br /> 22 likely impacted any plan. Staff is looking for further direction at this time. Council <br /> 23 Member Rafferty noted that the proposed tax cap charter amendment is not going forward <br /> 24 at this time and he understands that the numbers in the draft plan are not firm because <br /> 25 they can't be but he wonders what the council should be doing to meet the charter <br /> 26 requirement. Finance Director Rolek responded that typically a city prepares a five year <br /> 27 capital improvement plan because it contains things that you can look ahead at and use as <br /> 28 a planning tool. The city charter calls for something different than that. It calls for a plan <br /> 29 that is more like a budget. The council concurred that putting together information has <br /> 30 value but it should be called a forecast rather than a plan. Staff will put together <br /> 31 numbers and bring forward a forecast in December. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 1. Signal Projects, TKDA Supplemental Authorization—Community Development <br /> 34 Director Grochala introduced Larry Boehr, head of the municipal services division of <br /> 35 TKDA, present to answer questions. Mr. Grochala explained that staff is requesting that <br /> 36 the council consider at their next regular meeting approval of a supplemental <br /> 37 authorization for services provided by TKDA related to the signal projects (Ware/Birch <br /> 38 and Lake/Main). Mr. Grochala explained the additional engineering services that were <br /> 39 required by the city and Anoka County. There were elements added to the original plans <br /> 40 requiring additional engineering services, some of which were requested by Anoka <br /> 41 County and that will be funded by them. Much of the work related to drainage. Mr. <br /> 42 Boehr concurred with Mr. Grochala's explanation adding that the services were required <br /> 43 due to an increase in the scope of the project and added that the costs have already been <br /> 44 incurred (work is done). Mr. Grochala updated the council on the levy amount for the <br /> 45 signal projects, where the projects currently stand with costs and noted that this <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.