My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05-31-2013 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2013 Packets
>
05-31-2013 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 11:07:37 AM
Creation date
9/15/2017 10:12:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Special
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
5/31/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,.� The east 330 feet (-L- or ) of the northeast one quarter (1/1) of the southeast one quarter <br />{1/4) of the southwest one quarter (1/4) of Section 8 <br />Subdivision 3. When construction of local improvements, the levy of special assessments <br />described in subdivision 2, on which a single-family, owner occupied residential unit existed on <br />September 30, 1993, the owner/occupant of such residential unit may file a petition with the City <br />Clerk objecting to the special assessment to be levied against his/her parcel. Such petition shall <br />be filed with the City at or before the first public hearing to be held on the project. After the <br />filing of such petition the City may not specially assess such owner's property for the <br />improvements constructed unless the owner, at his/her option, in the future elects to connect to or <br />use the improvements constructed by the City. Any notice of hearing mailed to such single <br />Jeff Reinert, Mayor <br />Attest: Julianne Bartell, City Clerk <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this day of , 2012. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council <br />Member and was duly seconded by Council Member <br />upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />The following voted against same: <br />and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.