My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-25-2013 Charter Packet
LinoLakes
>
Charter Commission
>
Agenda Packets
>
1981 - 2021 Agenda Packets - Charter Commission
>
2013 Packets
>
07-25-2013 Charter Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2021 11:22:56 AM
Creation date
9/15/2017 10:30:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Charter Commission
Charter Meeting Type
Regular
Charter Document Type
Packets
Supplemental fields
Date
7/25/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The south one half (113) of Southeast one quarter (1/1) of the southeast one quarter (1/4) <br />of Section 8 <br />quarter (1/4) of Section & <br />The ast 330 feat (1 or ) of the north= _. -t one quarter (1/1) of the southeast one quartz <br />(1/1) of the southw st one quarter (1/1) of Section & <br />Subdivision 3. When construction of local improvements, the levy of special a^sc.-mcats <br />for thc financing of those improvements specially benefit a parcel of real property, in an arca <br />des ibcd in subdivision 2, on which a single family, owner occupied residential unit existed on <br />-September 30, 1993, thc owner/occupant of such residential unit may file a petition with the City <br />be filed with the City at or before thc first public hearina.to be he'd on the project. After the <br />filing of such petition thc City may not specially az ass such owner's property for thc <br />improvements contracted unless thc owner, at his'hei -option, in the fie elects to conn,.ct to or <br />Attest)3ulianne Bartell,,bity C er <br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 13th day of August, 2012. <br />The motion for the adoption of -the foregoing ordinance was introduced by Council Member <br />O'Donnell and was duly seconded by CoundSl Member Roeser and won vote -being taken <br />thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />O'Donnell, Roeser, Rafferty, Reinert <br />The following voted against same: <br />None (Absent- Stoesz) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.