Laserfiche WebLink
(July 25, 2013) <br />Mayor Reinert and Council Member Stoesz, <br />I couldn't disgree more with both the premise and the content of the letter you've asked the City <br />Clerk to forward to me. I find your attempts to blur the facts and redefine the commission's <br />actual vote to be completely disrespectful and inappropriate. Your statement that "To date there <br />has been no formal request by the charter commission to meet with the city council regarding <br />Commissioner Storbergs motion" is a complete disresgard of the November 8 vote of the <br />Commission. That vote reads as follows: <br />"MOTION by Commissioner Storberg, seconded by Commissioner Gunderson, to have the <br />entire Council and the entire Council meet together to discuss the provisions of Chapter 8. <br />AMENDMENT offered by Commissioner Timm that there be a tight agenda agreed to the <br />Mayor and the Commission Chair and that some procedural rules for discussion be defined." <br />Working within these parameters, the Mayor and I did agree on a tight agenda and some <br />procedural rules. However, on February 21 2013, the Mayor went before the Commission to <br />renegotiate that agreement. The Commission voted to reject the Mayor's agenda and adopt the <br />original agreed-upon agenda, which I had presented. <br />As you know, on April 23, 2013 the Commission proposed two joint meeting dates, May 16 and <br />May 30. An official response to an official invitation is a minimal expectation, but Council <br />chose to ignore the invitation, failing not only to respond, but also failing to even discuss the <br />matter. Three months have elapsed, and a joint meeting has never been on any City Council <br />agenda. Your July 23 correspondence is merely a personal e-mail aimed at disguising Council's <br />inaction, and the Charter commission will not be used by you to promote your personal agenda. <br />What is taking place here is in fact an under the table solicitation to induce the Commission to <br />initiate something on your terms. The Mayor stated on February 21 that "Council is not driving <br />this," and it is now apparent that you seek to push the Commission into the driver's seat of your <br />vehicle on your road aimed in the direction of your choosing. <br />As always, the Charter Commission is willing to honor formal and proper requests from the City <br />Council. However, even after three months, we haven't received such a request. Attempted <br />misrepresentations such as these only serve to promote mistrust. It is not in the best interests of <br />anyone, be it Council, Commission, or the residents, to be party to such inappropriateness. The <br />Charter commission will not be party to this. To be clear, I will not legitimize your personal <br />email by forwarding it through the office of the Chair to the Charter Commission. <br />It is my most sincere wish that the Mayor and Council abandon these kinds of practices and <br />instead begin to deal with the Commission in good faith, rather than employing Chicago <br />politics. I look forward to the day when you recognize that dealing in an open, honest, and fair <br />manner is the only way to truly resolve any differences and/or arrive at the best outcome for all <br />concerned. <br />Sincerely, <br />Christopher Lyden, Chair <br />Lino Lakes Charter Commission <br />