My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-03-2012 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2012
>
12-03-2012 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2014 11:55:04 AM
Creation date
3/7/2013 10:43:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/03/2012
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 3, 2012 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : December 3,2012 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 9:20 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Stoesz, O'Donnell, <br /> 8 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br /> 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Director of Public Safety John <br /> 13 Swenson; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; Economic Development <br /> 14 Coordinator Mary Alice Divine; City Engineer Jason Wedel; Finance Director Al Rolek; <br /> 15 Environmental Coordinator Marty Asleson; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br /> 16 <br /> 17 1. Joint Powers Agreement for Conduct of Elections—City Clerk Bartell introduced <br /> 18 Cindy Reichert, Anoka County Elections Manager who was present to explain and <br /> 19 answer questions about a proposed Joint Powers Agreement between the county and city <br /> 20 regarding equipment and services for conducting elections. Ms. Reichert explained that <br /> 21 the proposal before the council is the result of three years work among all elections <br /> 22 partners in Anoka County. The proposal includes participation of all cities and school <br /> 23 districts in the county, has been reviewed by a multi jurisdictional voting equipment task <br /> 24 force and was passed on to the Anoka County Board where it received approval. Ms. <br /> 25 Reichert explained that the year 2000 was the last purchase of equipment by cities (ballot <br /> 26 boxes and counters); there are actually many other areas of equipment involved. With <br /> 27 individual city ownership, it's more difficult to manage equipment services. She further <br /> 28 explained that within the last decade also, federal certification of equipment became a <br /> 29 reality. Voting equipment companies have also faced changes and challenges. The <br /> 30 capital cost of the equipment is about twice the previous purchase price and maintenance <br /> 31 services have increased in many parts due to more complexity in the equipment. <br /> 32 Council Member Stoesz asked if the new equipment will change the way that the city <br /> 33 transmits results to the county. Ms. Reichert explained that while a modem system will <br /> 34 still be used,the results will continue to be printed also and the modem system will be <br /> 35 updated. Council Member Stoesz received additional information on securities in the <br /> 36 system as well as equipment storage requirements. Ms. Reichert further explained that the <br /> 37 current equipment is declining with parts failing and while it still counts votes accurately <br /> 38 and is fully tested each year,the system relies on a DOS background that is no longer in <br /> 39 use or upgradeable. Council Member Roeser asked if the absentee ballot counting will <br /> 40 move to the precincts with the new equipment. Ms. Reichert explained that central <br /> 41 counting of ballots is required under law and in Anoka County that central location is the <br /> 42 county; the service is included in the JPA. The council discussed options and concurred <br /> 43 that participating in the JPA is the best course of action for the city. Council Member <br /> 44 Roeser suggested that precinct locations are a concern and indicated that he'd like to <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.