Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES March 14,2011 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 133 specified campaign signs and that can raise a constitutional free speech issue. Staff has worked with <br /> ..- 134 the city attorney to develop new language for election year signage. <br /> 135 <br /> 136 A council member noted that he reviewed the Secretary of State's website regarding absentee balloting <br /> 137 periods and saw that it is 45 days for some but 30 days for municipal or stand-alone elections. He <br /> 138 believes the sign allowance should be concurrent with the balloting period. <br /> 139 <br /> 140 The mayor noted that the 30 day period would seem more appropriate for signs in the city. Another <br /> 141 council member agreed. <br /> 142 <br /> 143 City Attorney Langel noted that the primary intent of bringing forward this amendment is to ensure that <br /> 144 the city's regulations don't target campaign signs. The sign allowance period as it relates to the <br /> 145 absentee balloting period would be a council discussion. <br /> 146 <br /> 147 Council Member Roeser moved to approve first reading of Ordinance No. 08-11 with an amendment to <br /> 148 change the 46 day period to 30 days. Council Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion adopted <br /> 149 on a voice vote; Council Member O'Donnell absent. <br /> 150 <br /> 151 6C) Extending Deadlines <br /> 152 i. Consider Resolution No. 11-29, Extending Deadlines for Main Street Village Planned Unit <br /> 153 Development and Conditional Use Permits <br /> 154 ii. Consider Resolution No. 11-30, Extending Deadlines for The Preserve Planned Unit <br /> �'' 155 Development <br /> 156 iii. Consider Resolution No. 11-31,Extending Deadlines for Moon Marsh Planned Unit <br /> 157 Development <br /> 158 City Planner Smyser noted the three requested extensions. The economy has put things into a dormant <br /> 159 state and so these extensions on city requirements are being seen by the council. <br /> 160 Council Member Gallup moved to approve Resolution No. 11-29 as presented. Council Member <br /> 161 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion adopted upon a voice vote; Council Member O'Donnell absent. <br /> 162 Council Member Gallup moved to approve Resolution No. 11-30 as presented. Council Member <br /> 163 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion adopted upon a voice vote; Council Member O'Donnell absent. <br /> 164 Council Member Gallup moved to approve Resolution No. 11-31 as presented. Council Member <br /> 165 Roeser seconded the motion. Motion adopted upon a voice vote; Council Member O'Donnell absent. <br /> 166 <br /> 167 6D) Consider Resolution No. 11-34, Accepting Lilac St.(CSAH 153) from Anoka County, City <br /> 168 Engineer Studenski explained that in the 1990's, Apollo Drive was constructed by Anoka County and <br /> 169 it tied into Lake Drive. It's opening eliminated the use of Lilac Street. It was decided during the <br /> 170 recent construction of the nearby highway interchange that Lilac Street should be turned back to the <br /> 171 city. The turnback will actually mean the city will receive additional maintenance assistance from the <br /> 172 county. <br /> 173 <br /> 174 <br /> 4 <br />