My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 10:21:08 AM
Creation date
9/18/2017 3:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
738
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> 8 <br /> <br />and thereby assists Anoka County in recognizing those social, environmental, and economic <br />factors that ultimately play a role in determining community vulnerability to hazards. <br /> <br />Section 4: Hazard Assessment is made up of three subsections: Hazard Identification, Hazard <br />Analysis, and Hazard Vulnerability. Together, these sections serve to identify, analyze, and <br />assess Anoka County’s overall risk to hazards. The risk assessment also defines any hazard <br />risks that may uniquely or exclusively affect the individual municipal jurisdictions. The risk <br />assessment builds on available historical data from past hazard occurrences, establishes <br />hazard-by-hazard profiles, and culminates in a hazard risk ranking based on conclusions about <br />the frequency of occurrence, spatial extent, and potential impact of each hazard. FEMA’s <br />HAZUS®MR loss estimation methodology was also used in evaluating some known hazard <br />risks by their relative long-term cost in expected damages. The information generated through <br />the risk assessment serves a critical function. As communities seek to determine the most <br />appropriate mitigation actions to pursue and implement, this information enables communities to <br />prioritize and focus their efforts on those hazards of greatest concern and those structures or <br />areas facing the greatest risk. <br /> <br />Section 5: Capabilities, Mitigation, and Maintenance provides' a comprehensive examination <br />of Anoka County and the participating local jurisdictions’ capacity to implement meaningful <br />mitigation strategies, identifies existing opportunities to increase and enhance that capability, <br />and details procedures for maintenance and evaluation of the Hazard Mitigation Plan. <br /> <br />Capabilities addressed in this section include planning and regulatory capability, administrative <br />capability, technical capability, and fiscal capability. Information was obtained through the use of <br />detailed survey questionnaires for local officials and an inventory and analysis of existing plans, <br />ordinances, and relevant documents. The purpose of this assessment is to identify any existing <br />gaps, weaknesses, or conflicts in programs or activities that may hinder mitigation efforts, and to <br />identify those activities that should be built upon in establishing a successful and sustainable <br />community hazard mitigation program. The community profile, risk assessment, and capability <br />assessment collectively serve as a basis for determining the goals for the Hazard Mitigation <br />Plan, each contributing to the development, adoption, and implementation of a meaningful <br />mitigation strategy that is based on accurate background information. <br /> <br />Mitigation Strategy is made up of two subsections: Mitigation Strategic Goals and Mitigation <br />Actions. Strategic Goals consists of broad, countywide goal statements for each local <br />jurisdiction participating in the planning process to strive for in achieving, as well as a general <br />description of the mitigation tools and techniques available for further consideration. The <br />strategy provides the foundation for identifying and prioritizing mitigation actions. Mitigation <br />Actions are action plans specific to each local jurisdiction, and link proposed mitigation actions <br />for each to locally assigned implementation mechanisms and target implementation dates. This <br />section is designed to make the Plan both strategic, through the identification of long -term <br />goals, and functional, through the identification of short-term and immediate actions that will <br />guide day-to-day decision-making and project implementation. <br /> <br />Plan Maintenance includes the measures Anoka County and its municipal jurisdictions will take <br />to ensure the Plan’s continuous long-term implementation. The procedures also include the <br />manner in which the Plan will be regularly evaluated and updated to remain a current and <br />meaningful planning document. <br /> <br />During this plan review process each jurisdiction actively participated in reviewing and updating <br />the relevant sections for their jurisdiction. The document below demonstrates how the sections
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.