My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-12-2017 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2017
>
06-12-2017 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 10:21:08 AM
Creation date
9/18/2017 3:55:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
06/12/2017
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
738
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Anoka County Multi-Jurisdictional <br />All Hazards Mitigation Plan <br /> 117 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />4.4.2 Critical Facilities and Infrastructure <br />According to HSEM, critical facilities and <br />infrastructure are those systems “whose <br />incapacity or destruction would have a <br />debilitating impact on the defense or economic <br />security of that community.” These systems <br />include the following eight general categories: <br />telecommunications infrastructure; electrical <br />power systems; gas and oil facilities; banking <br />and finance institutions; transportation <br />networks; water supply systems; government <br />services; and emergency services. <br /> <br />Anoka County does not maintain an active <br />database for critical facilities and infrastructure, <br />although it has begun to build one through its <br />development of GIS capabilities. <br /> <br />All participating municipalities provided the critical facilities and or assets within their <br />communities. Anoka County Emergency management then combined the local jurisdiction <br />information with the county information to identify all critical assets and structures. <br /> <br />This information was provided to the County’s Information Technology Department which <br />generated the value information from tax records and other sources. The content value was <br />estimated using the following average percentages. The structure value was used as the basis. <br /> <br /> Residential=20% <br /> Agriculture=30% <br /> Government=40% <br /> Commercial/Industrial=50% <br /> <br />For security purposes the detailed tables are located in Appendix B and contain the asset name <br />or description, the type of facility/asset, time open, capacity, square footage, structure and <br />content value. In addition the following information is provided. <br /> <br /> In Hazard defines whether the facility is within a hazard such as a Flood Plain, within a <br />3-mile radius of a major chemical facility, in the path of Dam Waters, within a 5-mile <br />radius of a nuclear facility, etc. <br /> Economic Asset defines whether the asset or facility produces significant revenue for the <br />jurisdiction or the loss of the facility would have a significant negative economic impact <br />on the jurisdiction. <br /> Historic Asset defines whether or not the asset or its contents is of significant historic <br />value to the jurisdiction. <br /> Construction defines the material the facility is constructed of: B=Block or Brick, <br />C=Concrete, M=Metal and W=Wood. Only the predominant material is listed. <br /> Emergency Generator identifies if the facility has alternate stand-a-lone power capability. <br /> <br />The table below is a summary table that is extracted from the detailed tables in Appendix B and <br />specifically lists the number of potentially at-risk buildings or facilities type, based on the GIS <br />Multi-hazard Requirement §201.6(c)(2)(ii)(A): <br />The plan should describe vulnerability in terms <br />of the types and numbers of existing and future <br />buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities <br />located in the identified hazard area <br />FMA Requirement §78.5(b): Description of <br />the existing flood hazard and identification of <br />the flood risk, including estimates of the number <br />and type of structures at risk, repetitive loss <br />properties. <br />A. Does the plan describe vulnerability in terms <br />of the types and numbers of existing buildings <br />(including repetitive loss structures), <br />infrastructure, and critical facilities located in <br />the identified hazard areas
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.