Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION April 4,2011 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 proposed project and the current status of the connectivity agreement. Mr. Karlson also <br /> 47 indicated that Anoka County representatives have met with concerned parties and have <br /> 48 done much to address outstanding questions. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Mr. Minke indicated that the agreement is not everything that all parties would have it be <br /> 51 but he feels everyone involved would say it's been improved with the latest review. Mr. <br /> 52 Karlson noted that one concern raised was the possibility of hidden costs to jurisdictions <br /> 53 that chose to participate in the network and Mr. Minke assured the group that there are no <br /> 54 costs involved to the city in the entering the agreement. Ms. Timm suggested that users <br /> 55 should think up front about where equipment would best be placed as conditions effecting <br /> 56 the service down the line (such as a in a non-temperature controlled facility) would not be <br /> 57 a responsibility covered in the agreement. <br /> 58 <br /> 59 Mr. Karlson clarified that the private contractor involved, Zayo Bandwidth, will actually <br /> 60 own the network equipment and pipeline. He asked about the equipment replacement <br /> 61 clause in the agreement and who is exposed to the costs when it comes to play in 2017? <br /> 62 Mr. Minke added that he anticipates that by 2017 there will be some type of process and <br /> 63 system to handle the equipment question; overall the type of equipment that would be <br /> 64 replaced isn't expensive. <br /> 65 <br /> 66 A council member mentioned that he is still struggling with the need for the project; there <br /> 67 is a cost to the taxpayers, including $2.8 million through the county. He's also not sure <br /> 68 that fiber is the latest technology and he questions the concept that this fiber has a 120 <br /> 69 year life. Mr. Minke explained that the county's goal with this project is to have <br /> 70 connectivity to more of its sites, including sites to which they currently rent fiber and to <br /> 71 achieve that at a cost savings. He added that the concept of service for 120 years is not <br /> 72 necessarily real time but it is the figure chosen for the period that services will be <br /> 73 available to the county. Ms. Timm added that for the $2.8 million that Anoka County is <br /> 74 putting in, it is getting a$20 million network; she reported that the county has made the <br /> 75 decision to go on the project so it will happen. <br /> 76 <br /> 77 When the Mayor asked if the network is not intended for home services, Mr. Minke <br /> 78 explained that the county has focused on services to government but it is reasonable to <br /> 79 think that others could come in and work with Zayo for services to other areas. For the <br /> 80 business community, Mr. Minke explained that they find the high speed services <br /> 81 attractive and having the fiber in place also adds to property values. <br /> 82 <br /> 83 The mayor noted that the council is attempting to identify the pieces of the project and <br /> 84 determine what is good now and for the future in this city. Mr. Minke noted that there are <br /> 85 really three pieces to the puzzle: the government network that would connect 145 anchor <br /> 86 institutions (with a service connection right away or within five years); the business <br /> 87 community where Zayo will have fiber capacity to serve business customers; and the third <br /> 88 parties who could buy capacity through Zayo to sell to other users. <br /> 89 <br /> 2 <br />