Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL BUDGET WORK SESSION August 22,2011 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : August 22, 2011 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 7:05 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 8:50 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, <br /> 8 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br /> 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Finance Director Al Rolek; <br /> 13 Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; Public Safety Director John Swenson; <br /> 14 Community Development Director Mike Grochala; Director of Administration Dan <br /> 15 Tesch; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br /> 16 <br /> 17 Explanation of Revenues—In response to the council's request, Finance Director Rolek <br /> 18 reviewed the revenues section of the 2012 budget book. Basically a city's tax levy fills <br /> 19 the gap after the city collects revenue. He explained the tax rate, the tax levy and fiscal <br /> 20 disparities. He explained that the tax rate is a formula that comes from the tax levy and <br /> 21 also the rate is used to compare with other cities (council requested that information). <br /> 22 The mayor noted that the tax rate ultimately impacts the amount paid by property owners; <br /> 23 it has a real effect on payers and that needs to be acknowledged. A council member <br /> `...." 24 remarked that it may make more sense to think in terms of charging for the cost of <br /> 25 services; the Finance Director explained that the cost of services is presented in the form <br /> 26 of the city budget. A council member noted concern that he experienced a decrease in the <br /> 27 value of his home last year but yet his taxes went up; that doesn't make any sense. A <br /> 28 member noted that the cost of services didn't go down, giving the example that it costs <br /> 29 the same to plow the snow in front of a$90,000 home as it does a$100,000 home. It was <br /> 30 acknowledged that the city has no control over other levying such as by the school district <br /> 31 and county. There was discussion about fines as revenue as well as forfeiture revenue. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Homestead Exclusion Program—Finance Director Rolek distributed written <br /> 34 information from a recent Webinar sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC). <br /> 35 He reviewed the information on the conversion of the State's Market Value Homestead <br /> 36 Credit(MVHC) Program to a new exclusion program. The program will exclude a <br /> 37 portion of the property value from taxation rather than giving a credit as in the past. The <br /> 38 result to the city is that it will lower values and thus increase the tax rate. It will have an <br /> 39 impact on the tax rate in 2012 and represents an additional $220,000 in the budget and <br /> 40 would require that amount to mitigate. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 The council then discussed the updated budget gap information that was provided. The <br /> 43 ECFE lease of a portion of the city facility remains uncertain and staff is assuming a <br /> 44 $60,000 levy reduction as a worst case scenario. Administrator Karlson suggested that <br /> 45 renegotiating the lease is a possibility also; he will inform the council as soon as <br /> 1 <br />