Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 6,2011 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 <br /> 47 The mayor asked the council if they would like to consider an ordinance change overall to <br /> 48 allow this situation? He suggested that staff should look more specifically at what other <br /> 49 cities are doing in this area and review the possibility of allowing the use of fence spikes. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 Mr. Jensen added that the fence is also a safety issue for his family as well as a matter of <br /> 52 privacy. He also has an issue that he cannot place a playset for his young children in the <br /> 53 yard if the fence isn't allowed as requested. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 2. Paul Montain—Zoning Issue at 8122 80th Street—Community Development <br /> 56 Director Grochala recalled that the zoning issue at 8122 80th St was brought forward <br /> 57 through a complaint on the use of the property for a trucking business. Staff has <br /> 58 investigated the fertilizer company operations that are occurring on the property. The <br /> 59 property owners are contending that the use is agricultural and therefore allowed. Staff <br /> 60 has considered it to be a trucking business use and therefore not a permitted use. The <br /> 61 property owners appeared at a recent Open Mike and requested an opportunity to discuss <br /> 62 the situation at a council work session. <br /> 63 <br /> 64 Paul Montain and Lloyd Drilling, owners of the property at 8122 80th Street, told the <br /> 65 council that they firmly believe the use at the site is agricultural and that it should be <br /> 66 allowed. The operations do involve trucks that are moving things around and the <br /> 67 operations are agriculture related. Mr. Montain pointed out that neither the city nor the <br /> 68 state of agriculture (and the operations involved) are the same as when the pertinent city <br /> '''"' 69 law was drafted (in the 1980's). He is exclusively involved in agriculture and he expects <br /> 70 the rules to recognize that; otherwise they need to be properly changed. Furthermore he <br /> 71 was told by the city's former attorney, Mr. Hawkins, that the use is permitted. <br /> 72 <br /> 73 Community Development Director Grochala clarified that the title of the land use district <br /> 74 may be confusing. It is not, in fact, intended to allow agricultural use. Perhaps a <br /> 75 clarification is what's needed. The mayor noted that it appears that the city may have to <br /> 76 revisit its ordinances in this area and figure out what makes sense for this situation and <br /> 77 others like it. <br /> 78 <br /> 79 The mayor noted that the city has received a complaint relative to noise, number of <br /> 80 trucks, dust, etc. Staff confirmed that the concern is about the vehicles operating a <br /> 81 business out of the property and providing services to others. The mayor suggested that <br /> 82 staff should be looking at all like situations for reference and studying the overall issue <br /> 83 while being sensitive to business and agricultural needs. <br /> 84 <br /> 85 City Attorney Langel suggested that the council should also focus on these ten acres and <br /> 86 the operations that are occurring there whereby a business is actually providing services <br /> 87 to others. Community Development Director Grochala suggested that it seems as if the <br /> 88 council wants to draw the line as far as use and would be interested in providing for a way <br /> 89 to operate a business such as this with some controls; perhaps a topic appropriately <br /> 90 discussed by the Planning and Zoning Board. Mr. Grochala added that, in the meantime, <br /> 2 <br />