Laserfiche WebLink
Page Four <br />July 17, 1874 <br />graphs and he will check on the possibility of legal action. <br />Mr. Kelling wanted to make a note of the fact that the small trees in front <br />of the Council Chambers are planted too far back under the overhang of the <br />building. They cannot get any rain and should be moved while still small. <br />Mr. Marier said he would report this to the Council. He also reported to <br />the Planning and Zoning Board on two meetings he and Mr. McLean had <br />attendrd with the Metro Council in connection with the Open Space plans of <br />tat agency. They had explained the City's stand that no further lands be <br />acquired in Lino Lakes for Park purposes. They are in the process of <br />getting $40,000,000.00 allocated for the "immediate acquisition" areas, <br />>id these areas range from $6,000.00 per acre down to $300/$400 per acre, <br />which is Lino Lakes. Of all the areas that have been so picked as "imnipc=ati- <br />acquisition" Lino Lakes had made the biggest contribution in acres. Mr. <br />Marler and Mr. McLean emphasizedthe fact that in no way will Lino Lakes <br />give up more land. One of the members at the meeting stipulated "fine <br />for now, hut wk will knock heads again", which tells Mr. Marier their intent <br />is to take more laud in Lino Lakes. Mr. Marier didnot think it would be <br />fair to the people if this were not known. The Committee did make a stag,-- <br />ment that they were not taking any resident homes at this time. The maps <br />also show as taking the entire Otter Lake area. Mr. Marier and Mr. McLean <br />reemphisized the fact that Lino Lakes will not give up any more land for <br />non-taxable purposes. It is Mr. Marier's feeling that they will be back <br />for more land. Mr. Marierefelt that good judgement had been used by this <br />Planning and Zoning Board in asking the people to do what is necessary to <br />have a good development, and now it seems that the Metro Council has put <br />label on our heads until 1990. As a Councilman at this time, he would let <br />the people do as they wish with their property as long as they follow the <br />C":ty Ordinances. He doesnot feel that the Metro Council should be able to <br />dictate to Lino Lakes or any other City, but somehow, they feel they can <br />do this. <br />There had been an open hearing on the 16th of July with about 60 people <br />in attendance, and emphasized how Hennepin County had done such an <br />extraordinanry job of acquiring land for open space. At,nn time did this <br />group make any comments about any other City or area. It was pointed out <br />that there are as many as five Cities have done more than their share for <br />land conservation. Mr. Marier didnot feel that any one of their people <br />and made any contribution. There will be another meeting ofi July 18 at <br />1:30 P.M. The final contract will be made between Staff people and the <br />Metro Open Space and Trasnsprtation Committees and their final decision <br />will go the the Council at a later date. <br />Mr. Kelling agreed with Mr. Marier saying these are a lot of his own feel- <br />ings along this line and is is his opinion that 2,500 acres of land is <br />enough. Mr. Kelling moved that the Planning and Zoning Board support the <br />sentiments expressed by Mr. Marier. Seconded by Mr. Hill. Motion carried. <br />Mr. Locher reported that he had made some calsulations on the .Otter Lake, <br />Lakeview Street. Using 684.5 as total footage, Mr. LaBuda would have <br />69.52 frontage and Prokop 30.5% frontage. If you have no petitioners at <br />all, the Council can order the plan. Using 60' per/in. Mr. LaBuda would <br />have 655.35%, Prokop, 285.74% and Junkis 57.44%, so they don't have the <br />