Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 1, 2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 by Comcast at no cost,valid through the course of existing franchise agreements (those <br /> L 47 vary in terms). There is a threat that the same arrangement may become unavailable in <br /> 48 the future so the concept of leasing circuits at a cost is on the table as well as cities <br /> 49 putting in their own fiber connections. The AFS network proposal fits well into the <br /> 50 concept of cities moving away from the franchise connection. He noted that the grant <br /> 51 process will be very competitive with many proposals expected. <br /> 52 <br /> 53 The council discussed the annual maintenance obligation. Mr. Heiser explained that <br /> 54 although it would be new cost to the city, it is divided among the nineteen Metro-INET <br /> 55 user groups according to the number of units and should remain fairly stable. The costs <br /> 56 may be reduced further by the inclusion of more groups in the future as well as identified <br /> 57 savings. <br /> 58 <br /> 59 The council agreed to consider a resolution of support at the council meeting. <br /> 60 <br /> 61 3. Budget <br /> 62 <br /> 63 Response to council questions—Finance Director Rolek noted that the management <br /> 64 team has collectively prepared answers to budget ideas brought forward by the council. <br /> 65 Many of the suggestions came from Council Member Roeser. The list was reviewed with <br /> 66 the following comments. Acting Administrator Tesch noted that Council Member <br /> 67 O'Donnell had submitted some budgetary ideas but they are not included in the current <br /> 68 report; responses on those items will be sent out to council members. <br /> 69 <br /> 70 Snow Plowing—the interest is in providing/sharing services with other jurisdictions in <br /> 71 areas where that makes sense. <br /> 72 <br /> 73 Emergency Services Dispatch—a merger to provide services to Centerville has been <br /> 74 discussed in the past and did not result in a change but is there a way to look again and <br /> 75 make it a successful and cost saving venture for all. A council member recalled past <br /> 76 discussions on the subject and the related concerns and expressed uncertainty that an <br /> 77 agreement is possible; it needs to be a fair situation for all. <br /> 78 <br /> 79 Utility Billing—there remains interest in sharing or providing services to other <br /> 80 jurisdictions. The council plans to look at all city resources and look for those <br /> 81 opportunities as a larger project. Such a process is vital and must be undertaken as part of <br /> 82 budget discussion. <br /> 83 <br /> 84 Fees for Services—Although staff reported that fees are reviewed annually,the council <br /> 85 remains committed to charging fees in direct correlation to the cost of services provided. <br /> 86 Where outsourcing makes sense it should be considered(example given where the City of <br /> 87 Ramsey contracts with a private service for electrical services previously provided by the <br /> 88 state and receives a portion of the fees). <br /> 89 <br /> `...„ 90 Seek Funding for Shovel Ready Projects— Staff has noted that qualified projects are <br /> 2 <br />