Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION July 26, 2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 91 history. In further explaining the difference in the versions, Mr. Squires said that version <br /> 92 one, paragraph six, contains language about barring city officials and employees from <br /> 93 using a language other than English and the other versions (versions two and three)relate <br /> 94 to the same but expand on that by changing the identification from"private"to "non- <br /> 95 official"communications and he feels this is preferable in consideration of the court's <br /> 96 concerns about free speech impediments. Further the term"official" is defined. He <br /> 97 suggests that version three is the best in his opinion and based on current activity in the <br /> 98 area that he has reviewed. He also suggested that he understands that the council's focus <br /> 99 is intended in the area of cost savings and to being proactive rather than reactive in the <br /> 100 area and he has tried to focus the language of the resolutions in that direction. In that <br /> 101 same light, he felt it important to set rules in place and at the same time be able to balance <br /> 102 those rights of individuals; it sets a clear future policy. <br /> 103 <br /> 104 The council reviewed the versions and comments were made. The council concurred <br /> 105 that version three is preferred. They are appreciate of Mr. Squires' work in digging <br /> 106 deeper and commend him on bringing forward a resolution that expresses very well the <br /> 107 cost saving intentions of the council. When a council member asked, if the resolution <br /> 108 were approved,what would change at city hall, Acting Administrator Tesch suggested <br /> 109 that if translation of official documents were requested, the resolution would prohibit that <br /> 110 service from being provided at any cost to the city. A council member added that a list of <br /> 111 free translation services could be put together to use as a resource as long as it is kept <br /> 112 clear that those services would include no liability to the city. A council member <br /> 113 confirmed that there hadn't actually been any requests for translation services to this <br /> 114 point; it was noted that the police department has provided translation services and would <br /> 115 continue to do so as a public safety requirement. <br /> 116 <br /> 117 A council member read the exceptions included in the resolution. The city attorney noted <br /> 118 that it represents a list developed by the U.S. English organization that is based on <br /> 119 experiences of other communities and also somewhat on federal law. <br /> 120 <br /> 121 A council member requested that the resolution be read in its entirety at the council <br /> 122 meeting. The city attorney was instructed to repeat his review of how the resolution was <br /> 123 developed. <br /> 124 <br /> 125 The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. <br /> 126 <br /> 127 These minutes were considered, corrected and approved at the regular Council meeting held on <br /> 128 August 9, 2010. <br /> 129 <br /> 130 <br /> 131 • <br /> 132 Imo_ . <br /> 133 Julianne Ba ell, City Cle ert,'•ayor <br /> 3 <br />