My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
07-08-2010 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
07-08-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 12:18:41 PM
Creation date
3/8/2013 11:18:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
07/08/2010
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JT CITY COUNCIL/CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING July 8,2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 180 <br /> 181 Commissioner Minar noted that he has seen city employee salary information that <br /> `w, 182 indicates there is a problem; the salaries are too high and there are people who would do <br /> 183 the jobs for less. Public employees should not be making more than their private sector <br /> 184 counterparts. Regarding road maintenance, it can be funded properly within a reasonably <br /> 185 reduced budget. <br /> 186 <br /> 187 Council Member O'Donnell suggested that staff could be hired at a lower salary but the <br /> 188 full picture includes consideration of what staff brings to the city, i.e. the city's high bond <br /> 189 rating saves the city lots of money. Regarding the subject at hand, a tax levy, he doesn't <br /> 190 have a problem seeing it considered if that is a goal of the commission and it is best for <br /> 191 the citizens. <br /> 192 <br /> 193 Commissioner Gunderson suggested that the commission's goal isn't necessarily to go <br /> 194 out with a referendum on the question. The goal is to make sure there's a cap when the <br /> 195 state's levy limit requirement expires to protect the taxpayers of the city. <br /> 196 <br /> 197 There was discussion between the council and commissioners about the city's obligations <br /> 198 related to the Legacy at Woods Edge area and the possibility of an impact on city taxes. <br /> 199 <br /> 200 Chair Dahl thanked the council for input on this item indicated that the commission will <br /> 201 keep the matter(tax cap) on their agenda. <br /> 202 <br /> 203 New Business <br /> 204 <br /> 205 A. Road Improvements—How do we get there? (Council initiated agenda item) <br /> 206 1 a. Joint Subcommittee (Council initiated agenda item) <br /> 207 <br /> 208 Mayor Reinert asked if the commission feels that there is a problem with current process <br /> 209 for reconstructing roads. He noted that there has been one road reconstructed in the last <br /> 210 twenty years but information would seem to indicate that while it's not an emergency, <br /> 211 more work is needed. There have been failed referendums. He is interested in hearing <br /> 212 the commission's viewpoint and any suggestions. <br /> 213 <br /> 214 Commissioner Turcotte noted that he has reviewed the city's Pavement Management Plan <br /> 215 and would like an explanation of the city's maintenance program. Community <br /> 216 Development Director Grochala explained the city's current program of sealcoating and <br /> 217 overlay, noting that there are streets in the city that are past the point where either of those <br /> 218 processes would be helpful. <br /> 219 <br /> 220 Council Member O'Donnell noted that it is good that the city has a pavement <br /> 221 management plan but bad that it hasn't been fully funded (although full funding is in <br /> 222 place again recently). In regard to the work that was done in the past (by the citizens task <br /> 223 force) to address the matter of reconstructing the city's roads, he'd like to leverage that <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.