Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 23,2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 ordinance would put into the city code some control measures related to illicit discharge. <br /> 47 Such control measures are a requirement for Lino Lakes as an operator of a small <br /> 48 municipal storm water and sewer system. The ordinance has been reviewed by the city's <br /> 49 Environmental Board and is forwarded for council consideration. <br /> 50 <br /> 51 The council indicated that they would like more time to review the ordinance before final <br /> 52 passage. They will consider first reading but would like more discussion on the impact of <br /> 53 these regulations at the September work session. <br /> 54 <br /> 55 Item 6C, 2010 Surface Water Management, accepting quotes and awarding a <br /> 56 contract for surface water maintenance projects and street drainage projects—City <br /> 57 Engineer Studenski reviewed the price quotes that were received for the two projects. He <br /> 58 noted that the project plans did have to be reduced because the quotes came in a little <br /> 59 higher than anticipated. As a result, three of the five projects were removed in order to <br /> 60 stay within the 2010 budget. He noted that all critical projects will go forward. <br /> 61 <br /> 62 The council discussed the impact of the reduction and confirmed that it will not cause <br /> 63 problems as far as long term plans. Staff indicated they would provide information on the <br /> 64 long term program as part of the 2011 budget discussions. <br /> 65 <br /> 66 Item 6D, Resolution No. 10-73, electing to continue participation in the Local <br /> 67 Housing Incentives Account Program under the Metropolitan Livable Cities Act- <br /> 68 Planner Smyser noted that the pros and cons of continuing participation in this plan were <br /> �— 69 discussed at the August 11 work session, adding that the city has been participating since <br /> 70 1995. The grant funds available are the positive side while the negative would be the <br /> 71 potential that the city wouldn't be able to meet the program criteria. He has been <br /> 72 informed by the Metropolitan Council that the tax increment financing in the Legacy at <br /> 73 Woods Edge project qualifies the city. Staff doesn't see a down side and is <br /> 74 recommending that the city continue to participate in the program. <br /> 75 <br /> 76 The mayor noted that the goals for the program may conflict with the comprehensive <br /> 77 plan. Perhaps the city could apply for the funding if the need arises only. He is <br /> 78 concerned about voting for this resolution. <br /> 79 <br /> 80 Planner Smyser noted that the deadline attached to participation is September 1; he isn't <br /> 81 certain how the goals could conflict with the comprehensive plan since the language is <br /> 82 taken from that document. <br /> 83 <br /> 84 Since additional time to review the resolution had been requested and the deadline wasn't <br /> 85 seen as firm, the council decided to pull the resolution from the council meeting agenda <br /> 86 and rather to discuss it further at the next regular work session. <br /> 87 <br /> 88 Presentation by International Motorsports Entertainment and Development <br /> 89 Corporation (IMEDC)—Corporation representatives Jim Farnum and Scott Quick made <br /> 90 a presentation (on file). The corporation was formed a few years back and has worked <br /> 2 <br />