My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09-08-2010 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
09-08-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 2:22:29 PM
Creation date
3/8/2013 11:28:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/2010
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 8, 2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : September 8,2010 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 5:30 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 9:30 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Gallup,O'Donnell, <br /> 8 Rafferty,Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br /> 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Director of Administration Dan <br /> 13 Tesch; Community Development Director Mike Grochala; Director of Public Safety Kent <br /> 14 Strege, Public Services Director Rick DeGardner; Director of Finance Al Rolek <br /> 15 <br /> 16 2011 Proposed Budget—City Administrator Karlson explained that during the two <br /> 17 weeks that he has been on staff, he has made it a priority to meet with the directors and <br /> 18 has go through the budget for the coming year. He is confident that the directors are <br /> 19 presenting a budget tonight that will meet current service level needs for the city and its <br /> 20 residents. He envisions a budget process that involves a team effort including both <br /> 21 council and staff, and that brings forward a budget that meets service needs. A reduction <br /> 22 in the proposed budget will mean that some services will have to be curtailed. He would <br /> 23 have liked to have begun the budget process with a system of prioritization by the council <br /> 24 but timing did not allow for that. Staff is trying to present a budget that meets service <br /> 25 needs recognizing that the citizens are also facing a down economy and financial strains. <br /> 26 This is a preliminary budget and what is certified next Monday evening is as high as the <br /> 27 levy can go;there is more time to cut back after looking at priorities and other revenue <br /> 28 etc. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Finance Director Rolek spoke to the proposed budget before the council this evening. He <br /> 31 reported that staff has included the recommendations provided by the council in July— <br /> 32 capital enhancement for streets and equipment, and do away with employee furloughs. <br /> 33 Added to that the city is required to pay additional PERA costs, health insurance costs <br /> 34 don't remain static, and there is an obligation of a cost of living raise for the some police <br /> 35 personnel. The bottom line is that the city is a service provider and that means much of <br /> 36 the costs are personnel related. He noted that storm water maintenance is included in the <br /> 37 budget but staff recognizes that the council is considering a storm water utility that would <br /> 38 reduce the levy by approximately$311,000. He noted that various expenditures have <br /> 39 been reduced by $48,000. The preliminary levy proposed is below the state's levy limit <br /> 40 by about $426,000, indicative of the city holding the line over the past few years. Within <br /> 41 the levy also is about $240,000 of state mandated tax relief(Market Value Homestead <br /> 42 Credit)that the city would normally receive back from the state but due to state cutbacks, <br /> 43 probably will not receive back in 2011. Given all of the factors presented,the council is <br /> 44 looking at a proposed budget that will increase by approximately 4% and a tax levy that <br /> 45 increases by approximately 6% (impacted somewhat by the civic center and YMCA <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.