Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION September 8, 2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 134 concern about presuming savings in health care since that area can be quite hard to pin <br /> 135 down. The mayor requested that the council consider a tax capacity of 40.9 representing <br /> 136 a tax levy of$8,510,000. Mr. Rolek explained that those figures would mean that the city <br /> 137 would have to cut $672,000 from the existing budget. A council member suggested that <br /> 138 the 40.9 figure wouldn't necessarily be prudent since reductions haven't been specifically <br /> 139 identified and the preliminary levy can always be lowered but not increased. The city <br /> 140 administrator concurred that it would make more sense to allow staff the time to present a <br /> 141 service level review so the council can make reduction decisions with that information <br /> 142 clear. <br /> 143 <br /> 144 Several council members concurred that the worst case scenario is that the city will "hold <br /> 145 the line" on taxes and while they certainly intend to reach for as much reduction as <br /> 146 possible,they feel it is prudent in setting that as the preliminary levy. The mayor <br /> 147 indicated that he is not comfortable with"holding the line"with the current economy and <br /> 148 valuation situation; he would like a reduction and he proposed a 41.5 tax capacity rate <br /> 149 ($8,630,000). There were several suggestions from council members to either hold the <br /> 150 line or to reach a compromise between holding the line and the mayor's suggestion. The <br /> 151 council concurred that the preliminary levy forwarded to the council meeting will be <br /> 152 $8,660,000. <br /> 153 <br /> 154 A department director suggested that it would be helpful for management staff to hear <br /> 155 about the council's service priorities for the city as they(the directors) consider what <br /> 156 options for reductions they will bring back. A council member responded that while the <br /> 157 council will have to rely somewhat on the institutional knowledge of the directors, it is <br /> 158 also important for staff to understand the council's priorities. Council members will <br /> 159 direct their individual comments on priorities to the administrator who can then share <br /> 160 information with the directors; there will be another budget work session to discuss <br /> 161 reductions. <br /> 162 <br /> 163 Mr. Rolek noted that additional actions to be considered on Monday evening will be <br /> 164 setting the public hearing on the budget for December 13 and nullifying the levy for <br /> 165 2005A bonds for the Legacy project(as it will be handled through an interfund loan once <br /> 166 again). <br /> 167 <br /> 168 Police Department Personnel -Administrator Karlson noted that Police Chief Strege <br /> 169 has a request standing to fill two vacant police officer positions(by moving up two <br /> 170 community service officers). The council concurred that public safety is a high priority in <br /> 171 the budget but it's difficult for the council to work on the picture in pieces; they would <br /> 172 like to consider all the 2011 budget decisions with all information on the table. Police <br /> 173 Chief Strege added that the department is working out the personnel situation to make <br /> 174 sure that the patrol functions are fully covered but there is some risk that the CSO's who <br /> 175 are POST eligible could chose to interview elsewhere and that would be a great loss to <br /> 176 the city and department. The council also received information on special assignment <br /> 177 officers. <br /> 178 <br /> 4 <br />