Laserfiche WebLink
• CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 4, 2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 91 spending spree. To calm those fears, the council could: clearly reduce taxes; put a cap on <br /> 92 expenses paid through the utility; make the funding a back up for special expenses but <br /> 93 with special consideration; and include a sunset provision for the utility. <br /> 94 <br /> 95 A council member concurred that a very strict definition of everything attached to the <br /> 96 utility would be necessary. It would have to be absolutely clear what the budget includes. <br /> 97 He is still looking for a way to make it work, however, because he sees that the city's <br /> 98 property tax payers are subsidizing other users(prisons, schools). The concept of <br /> 99 supervising the fund and the utility through an advisory board(Environmental Board) is <br /> 100 good. <br /> 101 <br /> 102 There was a concern voiced that this still appears to be just trading money. More <br /> 103 definition of the budget and how funds would be carried forward is absolutely needed. <br /> 104 <br /> 105 The council and staff discussed the history of the state allowing cities to establish this <br /> 106 type of utility; it was related to the mandates that city must face in the area of water <br /> 107 management. <br /> 108 <br /> 109 Staff will present more budget details; the council is particularly interested in trackability <br /> 110 and accountability in the budget. <br /> 111 <br /> 112 5. Set Budget Work Session—The council established that the next budget work <br /> 113 session would be held on October 20 at 5:30 p.m. (this date was later changed to October <br /> L 114 21). <br /> 115 <br /> 116 6. Odd Year Elections—City Clerk Bartell explained that the concept of the city <br /> 117 changing from an odd to even year election cycle for municipal elections is being brought <br /> 118 forward at the request of two council members who presented it as an efficiency and cost <br /> 119 saving possibility. Of the eighty plus cities in Anoka County, only two cities have their <br /> 120 municipal elections in odd years (Lino Lakes and Circle Pines). She explained that the <br /> 121 requirement for the current practice of odd-year city elections is included in the city <br /> 122 charter so a charter amendment would be required for a change. The process for charter <br /> 123 amendments(as set forth by state statute)was reviewed. Ms. Bartell noted the biyearly <br /> 124 costs associated with holding an exclusive municipal election; the costs would be saved <br /> 125 entirely along with staff's work and time associated with the election process. She also <br /> 126 noted that any change to the election cycle would obviously result in an impact to terms <br /> 127 of office for the council and mayor positions. It is advisable that any change in terms be <br /> 128 determined and included in the enacting ordinance so it is clear up front. Staff is seeking <br /> 129 direction from the council on their interest in further discussion or moving forward on a <br /> 130 change and, if appropriate, on what type of amendment the council would seek. <br /> 131 <br /> 132 The council discussed possible scenarios of enacting a change, including how long a <br /> 133 process would take. There was recognition that if the charter commission were to make <br /> 134 the recommendation to the council, the process would be shorter and the savings would <br /> 135 come quicker. The charter commission meets quarterly and has a meeting in October. <br /> 3 <br />