Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION October 21, 2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 <br /> L 47 Finance Director Rolek reviewed the 2010 budget forecast through September 30, 2010, <br /> 48 including favorable/unfavorable revenues and expenditures. He noted that with revenue <br /> 49 running under at approximately $244,561 and expenditures running with savings of <br /> 50 approximately $608,478, the forecasted surplus for 2010 is $363,917. Upon request, Mr. <br /> 51 Rolek explained that the city doesn't receive Local Government Aid (LGA) from the state <br /> 52 because the city ranks low on the criteria for that funding(i.e. age of housing, population <br /> 53 growth, economic vitality). <br /> 54 <br /> 55 2011 Budget Discussion—Finance Director Rolek noted that staff is presenting(in their <br /> 56 report)possible budget reductions for the council's consideration. He reviewed the list, <br /> 57 noting that it totals $572,231 or about $50,000 below the figure needed to balance the <br /> 58 budget. He also noted that the list includes a proposal to eliminate the Public Works <br /> 59 Superintendent position(to be vacated by a retirement) as well as eliminate the Natural <br /> 60 Resource Specialist position and create a Streets Supervisor position. Also the Senior <br /> 61 Coordinator position would be eliminated under this proposal with some of the duties <br /> 62 transferred to a Recreation Supervisor already in place. <br /> 63 <br /> 64 A council member remarked that the proposed reductions include less levy funding for <br /> 65 capital equipment and wondered how the city can keep up with its capital equipment <br /> 66 needs with such a reduction. Mr. Rolek explained that debt funding can be substituted. <br /> 67 <br /> 68 Administrator Karlson reviewed a chart that indicated the city's total full time equivalent <br /> 69 (FTE)positions (non-police) over the past ten years. He noted that the spike in personnel <br /> 70 between 2004 and 2009 is not necessarily attributed to population growth but rather some <br /> 71 grant funding and natural resource mandates. <br /> 72 <br /> 73 It was confirmed for a council member that there would be no loss of services with the <br /> 74 restructured Street Supervisor position; some of the duties of the Public Works <br /> 75 Superintendent position would be shifted to the Public Works Director, some to the <br /> 76 Environmental Coordinator and some to seasonal workers. Public Services Director <br /> 77 DeGardner added that the filling of the new position will be handled as required by the <br /> 78 impacted labor union. <br /> 79 <br /> 80 When asked about the reduction of two patrol officer positions, Chief Strege explained <br /> 81 that the department's major focus on absorbing that loss would be to maintain full <br /> 82 staffing for the patrol functions. That may mean that the city's officer assigned to the <br /> 83 Violent Offender Task Force would be pulled back as well as some school related <br /> 84 functions realigned. Chief Strege said the department is being creative and will make it <br /> 85 successful if that is the direction of the council. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 The mayor acknowledged the creativity of staff in the reductions presented; it must be a <br /> 88 team effort that brings the city through the difficult economic times. <br /> 89 <br /> 2 <br />