11-08-2010 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

I, COUNCIL MINUTES November 8, 2010 APPROVED 141 amount at a minimum of$300,000 with the city additional insured, signage as required,notification L./,42 of neighbors as advised by the city) and a review process of the designation allowed after six months. 143 144 Council Member Gallup moved approval any and all conditions of Minnesota Statute 347.50 through 145 347.56 including the addition of the city on the policy and notification of neighbors in the immediate 146 area(to be designated by staff). The dog owner can request a review of the designation as allowed by 147 statute. Council Member Roeser seconded the motion. 148 149 A council member indicated that he would not support the motion because he cannot in good 150 conscious allow a dangerous dog to remain in the city; that would not represent the greatest good for 151 the greatest number in this city. He hopes the dog could be removed from the city without having to 152 be destroyed. 153 154 A council member recognized that moving the dog out of the city includes a requirement to notify the 155 new jurisdiction which would put in place their rules. Another council member agreed that there is 156 too much at risk if the dog were to bite again. 157 158 A council member asked the family to respond to the requirements. Mitchell Sawh indicated that 159 they will absolutely follow the directions—whatever is necessary. They will be officially informed by 160 the city of the requirements. 161 162 Motion carried on a voice vote; Council Members O'Donnell and Rafferty voted no. '63 '164 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER 165 166 There was no report from the Public Services Department. 167 168 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT,MICHAEL GROCHALA 169 170 6A. Resolution No. 10-99,Approving Final Payment for the 2010 Street Sealcoat Project—City 171 Engineer Studenski noted that Pearson Brothers completed this project based on the city's direction. 172 The project came in slightly below the projection. All work has been reviewed and found to be 173 satisfactory so he is recommending approval of the final payment project. 174 175 Council Member O'Donnell moved to approved Resolution No. 10-99 as presented. Council Member 176 Gallup seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 177 178 6B. Resolution No. 10-100,Authorizing Application to the 2010 to 2012 Community Forest 179 Bonding Grant—Environmental Coordinator Asleson reported that staff is requesting authorization to 180 apply for grant funds to be used to add species diversity to its forest. If successful,the city could 181 purchase up to $25,000 or about 175 trees for parks and boulevards. The council confirmed that the 182 species planted would be considerate of current tree disease problems. 183 184 Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 10-100 as presented. Council Member 85 O'Donnell seconded the motion. Motion carried on a unanimous voice vote. 186