Laserfiche WebLink
• F <br /> CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 10,2010 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 2 MINUTES <br /> 3 <br /> 4 DATE : November 10,2010 <br /> 5 TIME STARTED : 6:23 p.m. <br /> 6 TIME ENDED : 7:58 p.m. <br /> 7 MEMBERS PRESENT : Councilmember Gallup, O'Donnell, <br /> 8 Rafferty, Roeser and Mayor Reinert <br /> 9 MEMBERS ABSENT : None <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Director of Administration Dan <br /> 13 Tesch; Community Development Director Michael Grochala; Director of Public Safety <br /> 14 Kent Strege; Director of Finance Al Rolek; Director of Public Services Rick DeGardner; <br /> 15 City Clerk, Julie Bartell. <br /> 16 <br /> 17 1. 2011 Budget Cuts—Administrator Karlson distributed written information to the <br /> 18 council. He reviewed a tax levy recap indicating the proposed tax levy,the adopted <br /> 19 preliminary levy and the amount need to balance the 2011 budget. He reviewed the list of <br /> 20 budget cuts proposed by the city's department directors, specifically explaining the <br /> 21 adjustments being suggested for employee health insurance. <br /> 22 <br /> Li iv 23 2. Estimate of Future Tax Levy Impact—Finance Director Rolek reviewed the <br /> 24 information he had prepared regarding future tax levy impacts. The council reviewed <br /> 25 with Mr. Rolek charts indicating net tax capacity calculation estimates through 2012, as <br /> 26 well as net tax capacity rate calculations estimated through 2012 and including certain <br /> 27 variables (i.e. health care, wage increases). <br /> 28 <br /> 29 The mayor, in reviewing the proposed budget cuts, noted his concern about a reduction in <br /> 30 the fund reserve and capital equipment levy. A council member pointed out that even <br /> 31 with the proposed $100,000 reduction in fund reserve, the city's reserve will still increase <br /> 32 from 2010 to 2011. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 A council member noted the reduction of positions in the police department and received <br /> 35 confirmation that the reduction would not violate the terms of a grant agreement under <br /> 36 which that department is receiving funds. It was further clarified that with the reduction <br /> 37 of one Community Service Officer position, the city will still maintain three of those <br /> 38 positions. Chief Strege added that the department would intend to move some officers <br /> 39 around to ensure that patrol functions are fully covered, including the possible <br /> 40 reassignment of the officer from the Violent Offenders Task Force. Chief Strege also <br /> 41 suggested that, if the budget cuts proceed, some services in the department such as the <br /> 42 Citizens Academy may be shifted to a later date. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 A council member expressed some concern about the amount of budget detail with which <br /> 45 the council has been able to engage. He'd like to be able to see the budget more on the <br /> 1 <br />