My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03-02-2009 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2009
>
03-02-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 10:49:57 AM
Creation date
3/11/2013 10:26:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/02/2009
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION March 2, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 123 The council reviewed the area in perspective of the proposed comp plan update and more <br /> 124 information was received on what is envisioned in the area. <br /> 125 The applicant was advised that he may want to speak with staff about what would be <br /> 126 required to expand the business onto the adjacent lot before he actually purchases the <br /> 127 property. <br /> 128 The council will consider the matter at the upcoming council meeting. <br /> 129 3. Police Department Annual Report - Police Chief Pecchia presented the council <br /> 130 with a draft annual report that was reviewed and discussed. He highlighted the low Part 1 <br /> 131 and Part 2 crime rate in the city(lowest in the area), the value of volunteer hours and <br /> 132 community oriented policing, involvement in the gang strike force, and succession <br /> 133 training. He reviewed the organizational structure and department plans into the future. <br /> 134 He noted how problems at the Lakewood Apartments were effectively addressed through <br /> 135 the crime free multi housing program. The many police programs that will be continued <br /> 136 were noted and are listed in the report. He noted that the council should watch the city's <br /> 137 website for maps providing useful information to citizens. Council members are <br /> 138 encouraged to contact the chief with any questions or comments. The report will be <br /> 139 presented again at the upcoming regular council meeting. <br /> 140 4. Strategic Planning Process—This item was removed from the agenda. <br /> 141 5. Comprehensive Plan Update—Community Development Director Grochala <br /> 142 noted that the council requested more information on possible ordinance amendments to <br /> 143 reflect past directions (to control what the city doesn't want to happen). More <br /> 144 clarification on that request is needed by staff. He provided the council with updated <br /> 145 maps: land use and staging(based on group meeting with the Comp Plan Advisory Panel <br /> 146 discussion pulling out previously developed sewer areas), and density(showing the <br /> 147 council areas that are being discussed for the next ten years). Basically, the only change <br /> 148 in the new plan is adding the North Oaks piece, the Robinson farms site and the Main St. <br /> 149 site. <br /> 150 Staff anticipates setting a public hearing on the Plan before the Planning and Zoning <br /> 151 Board in April. <br /> 152 A council member suggested that there was discussion at the group meeting that indicates <br /> 153 a desire for change in the 32% density number. The council member suggested he has a <br /> 154 desire to contest that number with the Metropolitan Council because the city otherwise <br /> 155 will be penalized for how it has developed to this point. To follow through on that, there <br /> 156 should be an alternative proposal. Staff questioned whether the challenge is on density <br /> 157 or on affordability and the council member responded that the two are linked because of <br /> 158 property values—you can't get affordability without density. <br /> 159 A council member noted that the approach of utilizing city regulations (ordinances)to <br /> 160 guide still seems like the best approach. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.