Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES May 11, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 93 that are explained in the staff report. He reviewed the council's revisions to this point. Also <br /> x-94 noted were the several landowner requests for revision to the future land use map and utility <br /> 95 staging plan. <br /> 96 Mr. Grochala acknowledged that the council has discussed the possibility of lowering the <br /> 97 forecast statement. The original regional forecast had the city at 10,600 households by 2030 and <br /> 98 going back to that would be about 2,000 households less than the 6,600 proposed in the Plan <br /> 99 before the council. There would be some additional consultant assistance required to roll back <br /> 100 some of the accompanying plans such as transportation and sewer but staff has determined they <br /> 101 would not have to make any land use changes or changes to employment forecasts. <br /> 102 The council requested an opinion from the city attorney regarding the rules of consideration of <br /> 103 the Plan and an explanation of the Metropolitan Council rules and regulations if the council were <br /> 104 to delay submission of the Plan. <br /> 105 Attorney Langel explained that city council approval requires four out of five votes per state <br /> 106 statute. Regarding the Metropolitan Council, the city is under extension to submit the Plan with <br /> 107 a current deadline of May 29, 2009; the statute doesn't provide for a penalty if that isn't met. <br /> 108 The following individuals addressed the council regarding the proposed Plan. <br /> 109 <br /> 110 Theresa Weinkauf, 797 Main Street. As a 33-year resident and current business owner, she is <br /> 111 concerned that her property continues to be zoned (guided) for commercial use. The Plan calls <br /> 12 for her property to be guided residential. The Planning and Zoning Board denied her request for <br /> 113 a revision to the Plan but suggested that they would possibly consider changes to the zoning <br /> 114 ordinance as it relates to home businesses that could impact her property, or suggested that she <br /> 115 could seek a conditional use permit. She bought the property as commercial and wishes for it to <br /> 116 remain that way. <br /> 117 <br /> 118 Community Development Grochala explained that Ms. Weinkauf has a situation where zoning <br /> 119 and comp plan designation/guidance for the property are not consistent. Staff saw a driveway at <br /> 120 the property as a natural place to draw the line for zoning. If the council wishes to make a <br /> 121 change to mixed use in the area, staff would like to look at the change on an area-wide basis. <br /> 122 <br /> 123 The council concurred that they don't desire to make a zoning change without proper review. <br /> 124 They will further review this matter at a work session, knowing that the council has authority to <br /> 125 change the Plan. <br /> 126 <br /> 127 Jeff Joyer, 8174 Lake Drive, submitted a letter to the council requesting that his property, the <br /> 128 Waldoch Farm Garden Center located in the 8100 block of Lake Drive, not be moved from <br /> 129 commercial zoning but rather that the Plan allow a 600 x 600 foot area to be designated as <br /> 130 commercial recognizing that is its current use and to allow for future growth of that business. <br /> 131 Although it has been suggested that the definition of"nursery" allows the business to sell what <br /> 132 they grow, the business is well beyond that now and expects to grow further. <br /> 133 <br /> 34 Community Development Director Grochala noted that the area in question would be guided for <br /> `-135 mixed use post 2030 and is so because sewer and water aren't planned in the near future. Staff <br /> 3 <br />