Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION May 4, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 45 Engineer Studenski suggested that it may be possible to do more of a"ballpark" estimate <br /> 46 initially by updating that information. A formal feasibility study would be required <br /> 47 eventually if the project moves forward. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Community Development Director Grochala suggested that the council may have to look <br /> 50 at the matter from a policy view point, since the current policy on referendum relates to <br /> 51 "road reconstruction" but this is not a full reconstruction project. <br /> 52 <br /> 53 Some residents of Pine Street were present and spoke on the matters of how many <br /> 54 residents it would take to block a project, information that indicates that Columbus has <br /> 55 already signed onto the project, the possibility of a speed study, and the possibility of <br /> 56 paving only to Zodiac Street. The residents also expressed interest in getting more law <br /> 57 enforcement (traffic) on the street; they were urged by the police chief to call 911 or <br /> 58 Anoka County dispatch whenever there is a problem. Some residents requested that the <br /> 59 city put down calcium chloride on the current gravel roadway since it has been helpful in <br /> 60 the past with keeping the dust down. <br /> 61 <br /> 62 The council directed staff to get a rough estimate of the project costs, contact the City of <br /> 63 Columbus regarding their interest in the project, research the possibility of any state <br /> 64 funding for the project and report back with a calendar indicating a referendum option. <br /> 65 The city will communicate back to the residents by sending out information and possibly <br /> 66 calling a neighborhood meeting. The council will discuss the matter again before <br /> 67 information is distributed and residents will be informed. <br /> �-' 68 <br /> 69 Charter Commission Bills—City Clerk Bartell reviewed the background on the 2008 <br /> 70 and 2009 bills that have been submitted by the Commission. The Charter Commission <br /> 71 attorney has submitted a more detailed bill for 2008 expenses; as well, the commission <br /> 72 has submitted two bills for 2009 services. <br /> 73 <br /> 74 The council accepted the detail of the bills submitted and directed staff to arrange for <br /> 75 payment. Regarding the 2009 budget, the council noted that these bills will bring the <br /> 76 Commission very close to expending their entire yearly budget; if the Commission <br /> 77 anticipates going over in 2009, they should inform the council. <br /> 78 <br /> 79 Strategic Planning Process - Agendas for the May 9 and May 14 special sessions were <br /> 80 distributed. A council member suggested that when the council decided to do these <br /> 81 sessions, the concept was to look at upcoming financial challenges; the proposed agendas <br /> 82 for the sessions indicate something of an expanded approach such as more general goal <br /> 83 setting. While that could be good, there is some concern about losing focus on the <br /> 84 original goals. The council should stay on task for that important discussion about <br /> 85 maintaining quality with a dwindling budget. Also the idea of 1) a meeting with the <br /> 86 council, 2) a meeting with the council and staff, and 3) a meeting to discuss progress <br /> 87 seems to be missing an important implementation phase. <br /> 88 <br /> 2 <br />