My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06-01-2009 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2009
>
06-01-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 10:52:54 AM
Creation date
3/11/2013 12:02:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
06/01/2009
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION June 1, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 1 Mr. Bob Bening, 6788 E. Shadow Lake Road, in regard to a statement that the council <br /> �_. 2 cannot make appointments to the commission,pointed out that state law allows the <br /> 3 council to do so if the chief judge doesn't do it. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 The council discussed the history of receiving instruction regarding charter commissions <br /> 6 from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC). Both the council and the commission have <br /> 7 had the benefit of those presentations. In this case, it would be appropriate to take full <br /> 8 advantage of those services. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 When asked if his appointed task has been completed, Mr. Doherty responded yes with <br /> 11 the exception of following through on the data practice request for information on how <br /> 12 the contract for services was let. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Rosemary Storberg, speaking as a citizen of Lino Lakes,noted her concern that the audit <br /> 15 wouldn't have happened if the referendum hadn't lost. She suggests that too much <br /> 16 money has been spent already on these issues (the referendum) and she doesn't think the <br /> 17 citizens of Lino Lakes would welcome yet more publicity. It would not be good for the <br /> 18 city. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 A council member clarified that the council never took a stand on how they wanted the <br /> 21 referendum to turn out. The citizens need to have as much information as necessary for <br /> 22 them to understand what is going on. The effort should be to continue to provide <br /> 23 proactive information that is helpful to the public in understanding the charter. <br /> 24 <br /> 25 A council member noted the history of the referendum that includes a citizen task force <br /> 26 recommendation that was more moderate than what was on the ballot. The process of <br /> 27 bringing that thorough and thoughtful recommendation to the people was high jacked. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 A citizen in the audience remarked that the citizens of the city have every right to know <br /> 30 when something runs afoul. It appears the commission worked outside the boundaries of <br /> 31 their authority whether they knew or not. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 A council member remarked that the council needs to be pro active on communicating <br /> 34 how the charter works. How do we communicate what our charter means? That's <br /> 35 another task for the council to consider. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDIT <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Finance Director Rolek introduced Michelle Bruley and Craig Poppenhagen of the city's <br /> 40 financial auditing firm, LarsonAllen, LLP. Mr. Poppenhagen distributed a summary of <br /> 41 the 2008 audit and reviewed the content(summary and all audit reports on file). <br /> 42 <br /> 43 The audit will be considered for approval by the council at their meeting on June 8, 2009. <br /> 44 Once the document is approved, it will be posted on the city's Web sit. <br /> 45 <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.