Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL WORK SESSION June 3, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 Comprehensive Plan Amendment that occurred in 2006. That would result in the <br /> 47 reduction of the cumulative 2030 household forecast by a total of 2,000 units and would <br /> �,,,, 48 also reduce the city's affordable housing goal to 560 units. That change would require <br /> 49 some text modifications and remodeling of the city's sanitary sewer system and traffic <br /> 50 system projections. <br /> 51 <br /> 52 A council member asked how the 2,000 reduction is reflected as far as the two plan stages <br /> 53 and staff explained that it would basically be based on staging but staging doesn't <br /> 54 guarantee development within a certain time period. <br /> 55 <br /> 56 Chris Lyden, 6275 Holly Drive W, asked if there is any criteria that would deal with a <br /> 57 situation where stage one is completed prior to plans. Would the city be able to question <br /> 58 stage two opening up prematurely? Also, regarding roadways, they will be greatly <br /> 59 impacted by fast growth and he is concerned that could create quality of life issues. <br /> 60 <br /> 61 Community Development Director Grochala responded that a movement to stage two <br /> 62 before its established time would require a comp plan amendment by the council. <br /> 63 Movement within the stages (la to lb)would require a council resolution. <br /> 64 <br /> 65 A council member requested a discussion on pace. Consultant Schlicting explained that <br /> 66 the council will have control over pace because they review and approve development <br /> 67 proposals based on the established goals and policies in the Plan. In one way the <br /> 68 infrastructure must precede the development and the Plan guides infrastructure <br /> 69 development and is a legal foundation on which to manage pace. Staff pointed out that a <br /> ~" 70 goal of the Plan is to accommodate quality growth; that includes the resource <br /> 71 management plan element that protects what the city has identified as planned resources <br /> 72 and the same follows with transportation and sewer where the plan includes goals. <br /> 73 <br /> 74 If the council directs the change in the forecast, staff would require some additional <br /> 75 consultant assistance in making modifications to the Plan elements. There will be more <br /> 76 land than forecasted but that will be explained as part of the modification. <br /> 77 <br /> 78 Paul Tralle, Planning and Zoning Board chair, addressed the council. He has been <br /> 79 involved in this process from the beginning. A great deal of time has been spent by many <br /> 80 volunteers from the community(17 meetings). There were public open houses, open <br /> 81 discussions in Zoning &Planning Board meetings, they crunched the numbers and he is <br /> 82 standing by the Plan they have recommended. He suggests that it is inappropriate for a <br /> 83 council member to discount all the work that went into the Plan and push to make <br /> 84 changes based on the input of four people at the last council meeting—there were many <br /> 85 more people involved in bringing it forward. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 A council member replied that he has had a level of concern from the onset of the process <br /> 88 with some of the numbers and, further, some residents have voiced concerns directly to <br /> 89 council members. It was noted that the changes being considered now won't change the <br /> 2 <br />