Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL WORK SESSION August 10, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 to the $500,000 amount would not adversely affect the city's credit rating; however, <br /> 47 formal approval of a fund balance policy is recommended. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 A council member pointed out that the level of resources and the activity level for the city <br /> 50 don't concur. Staff was directed to bring forward reductions in that light. The options <br /> 51 presented have essentially been reviewed by the council previously. If the staff isn't <br /> 52 willing to bring forward the necessary cuts, the council will have to do that. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 A council member pointed out that the area of personnel is the biggest part of the budget <br /> 55 and so is obviously the way to get the necessary reductions. To make that type of <br /> 56 decision, the council should hear about how service levels to the residents will be <br /> 57 impacted. <br /> 58 <br /> 59 A citizen in the audience addressed the group. She commended the council for <br /> 60 considering reductions because that is a necessary action. It is disappointing that more <br /> 61 direct recommendations are not included in the staff report. She spoke against any <br /> 62 revenue increases. Her question about reduction of funds for street maintenance was <br /> 63 explained as no reduction by the finance officer. She recommends that since revenue <br /> 64 from building permits is down drastically, that would be an obvious area for reduction <br /> 65 since that revenue would normally fund personnel costs for the service. When fuel cost <br /> 66 increases were questioned, the finance officer explained that energy costs are volatile so <br /> 67 he doesn't recommend severe changes in budgeting. She suggests that health insurance <br /> 68 costs should also be reviewed and perhaps other health insurance options could be <br /> 69 considered. Another recommendation is to reduce engineering costs in a down economy. <br /> 70 Also, overtime costs(police department mentioned) should be reviewed because use of <br /> 71 overtime has a low value for the dollar. <br /> 72 <br /> 73 A council member requested more consideration on staffing changes and pointed out <br /> 74 areas within budgets that probably have less activity because of the state of the city. <br /> 75 Collaborations for park services should be considered. <br /> 76 <br /> 77 A council member noted that the council salary should also be on the table. <br /> 78 <br /> 79 The meeting was recessed at 6:33 p.m. for the purpose on conducting the regular council <br /> 80 meeting. <br /> 81 <br /> 82 The meeting was reconvened at 7:40 p.m. <br /> 83 <br /> 84 Council members individually offered their opinion on the options listed in the staff <br /> 85 report. <br /> 86 <br /> 87 A council member suggested that sharing of clerical duties should be a possibility. Also <br /> 88 suggested was outsourcing of building inspection duties,with consideration that the area <br /> 89 has shrunk by about eighty percent. Staff explained that such a change would involve <br /> 90 service considerations. The building department should generally be self-supporting with <br /> 2 <br />