Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIALCOUNCIL MEETING September 8, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 2 CITY OF LINO LAKES <br /> 3 MINUTES <br /> 4 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING <br /> 5 <br /> 6 DATE : September 8, 2009 <br /> 7 TIME STARTED : 5:35 p.m. <br /> 8 TIME ENDED : 6:25 p.m. <br /> 9 MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Members Reinert, Stoltz, <br /> 10 Gallup, O'Donnell and Mayor Bergeson <br /> 11 MEMBERS ABSENT : none <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Also Present: Acting City Administrator Dan Tesch; Community Development Director <br /> 14 Michael Grochala; Public Safety Director Dave Pecchia; Director of Finance Al Rolek; City <br /> 15 Planner Jeff Smyser; City Clerk Julie Bartell <br /> 16 Mayor Bergeson called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. in the Council Chambers at Lino <br /> 17 Lakes City Hall. <br /> 18 The only agenda item was consideration of Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance <br /> 19 No. 06-09, amending the City Charter to require that council meetings <br /> 20 be televised. <br /> 21 City Clerk Bartell explained that the charter amendment proposal before the council was <br /> 22 brought forward by the Lino Lakes Charter Commission on July 13. The amendment would <br /> 23 add language to Section 3.01 of the Lino Lakes City Charter requiring all regular open council <br /> 24 meetings, the Open Mike portion, and council work sessions to be televised. <br /> 25 The charter commission requested that the amendment be considered a proposal under <br /> 26 Minnesota Statutes, Section 410.12, Subd. 7 Amendment by Ordinance. That statute sets forth <br /> 27 a schedule for consideration that the city must follow. A public hearing notice is required <br /> 28 within one month of receiving the proposal (published on August 11), and a public hearing is <br /> 29 to be held between Aug 25 and Sept 11 (hearing being held tonight, Sept 8). Looking <br /> 30 forward, the council must vote on the proposal within one month of the public hearing <br /> 31 (October 8 deadline). The remainder of the schedule for consideration, including two readings <br /> 32 at least 14 days apart,was reviewed. It was noted that the city attorney had provided an <br /> 33 opinion and some changes clarifiying the text of the amendment, however, the charter <br /> 34 commission had rejected any change. Ms. Bartell also outlined information included in the <br /> 35 staff report on how the amendment could be implemented. <br /> 36 Charter Commissioner Connie Sutherland explained that the commission brought forward the <br /> 37 proposed amendment to promote transparency in local government. The verbage of the <br /> 38 amendment includes adding the "Open Mike"portion to the televised portion of the council <br /> 39 meeting. It will also require televising of the council work sessions to give citizens the <br /> 40 opportunity to see how the council discusses and reaches its decisions for the city. <br /> 41 Mayor Bergeson opened the public hearing. <br /> 1 <br />