My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10-05-2009 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2009
>
10-05-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2014 10:58:00 AM
Creation date
3/11/2013 3:32:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/05/2009
Council Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIALCOUNCIL MEETING October 5, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Several council members commented that they still have questions about the text and/or <br /> 48 the logistics of implementing the amendment. Some items that need to be discussed <br /> 49 further are associated costs (Administrator Tesch had provided an email communication <br /> 50 to the council indicating costs associated with televising equipment for the community <br /> 51 room), options for meeting location, and what city meetings will be included. The <br /> 52 council intends to have a formal discussion with the charter commission on the subject. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 One council member suggested that if the council is to consider an ordinance in lieu of <br /> 55 this amendment to the charter, the time to act on that is now. It is concerning that there's <br /> 56 been no activity in the way of bringing forward an ordinance. <br /> 57 <br /> 58 City Attorney Langel opined that, considering the statutory schedule for consideration of <br /> 59 this amendment, the council must act on the amendment at this meeting. <br /> 60 <br /> 61 Council Members Reinert and O'Donnell requested that the topic of televising city <br /> 62 meetings and ordinance language requiring such be placed on this evening's council work <br /> 63 session agenda. <br /> 64 <br /> 65 A roll call vote was taken on Council Member Reinert's motion. Motion lost as follows: <br /> 66 Yeas, Reinert;Nays, Gallup, Stoltz, O'Donnell, Bergeson <br /> 67 <br /> 68 1A. I-35E/CSAH 14 (Main Street) Interchange <br /> 69 i. Resolution No. 09-72, , Ordering Improvement, I-35E/CSAH 14 (Main <br /> 70 Street) Interchange Improvements, Michael Grochala <br /> 71 ii. Resolution No. 09-73, Authorizing Execution of Joint Powers Agreement <br /> 72 with Anoka County, I-35E/CSAH 14 (Main Street) Interchange <br /> 73 Improvements, Michael Grochala <br /> 74 iii. Resolution No. 09-81, Dedicating city-owned property for project <br /> 75 purposes I-35E/CSAH 14 (Main Street) interchange Improvements, <br /> 76 Michael Grochala <br /> 77 Community Development Director Grochala noted that the council has three resolutions <br /> 78 before them this evening all relating to the 35E/CSAH 14 (Main Street) Interchange <br /> 79 Project(the "Project"). He distributed written information on Interchange Financing <br /> 80 Projections as prepared by Springsted Incorporated, consultant to the city on the Project. <br /> 81 Jenny Wolfe of Springsted was present. Staff last reported to the council that there was <br /> 82 not agreement with Anoka County on how to handle the city's portion of financing for the <br /> 83 project. At a previous meeting, staff presented four options to the council (as laid out by <br /> 84 Springsted)regarding the city's financial involvement in the project. <br /> 85 <br /> 86 Finance Officer Rolek noted that negotiations have continued with Anoka County and <br /> 87 several financial scenarios have been explored. Possibilities included the county carrying <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.