Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION December 7, 2009 <br /> APPROVED <br /> 84 5. 2010 Budget—At the last 2010 budget discussion, the council had indicated that they <br /> 85 would individually submit budget ideas to Acting Administrator Tesch. Mr. Tesch had received <br /> 86 those communications and had forwarded via email a compilation of ideas to the council <br /> 87 members. Mr. Tesch had also sent an email to council members outlining current proposed <br /> 88 personnel reductions, indicating that an additional $130,000 is available due to those reductions, <br /> 89 and reporting on the questions raised by Council Member Elect Rafferty regarding health care <br /> 90 budgeting. Finance Director Rolek explained that the health care budgeting calculations have <br /> 91 historically been based on the highest coverage costs for each employee, to allow for changes and <br /> 92 rising costs. To recalculate that portion of the budget to fund current service levels would save <br /> 93 an additional $180,000. <br /> 94 The council discussed use of the$310,000 that had become available. There was interest in <br /> 95 increasing the contingency as well as increasing the street maintenance budget and the equipment <br /> 96 replacement budget. It was noted that the council has had a long term goal of funding equipment <br /> 97 replacement on a yearly basis rather than having to finance large purchases, thereby saving on the <br /> 98 cost of borrowing the money. The annual target for that program was $200,000 however in <br /> 99 recent years the funding has dropped to zero. Funding street maintenance is a good investment to <br /> 100 save money in the long term. There was not concurrence to consider a change in the personnel <br /> 101 outlook. <br /> 102 In view of the proposed change in how the city budgets for employee health insurance, the <br /> 103 council reviewed the city's program. It was clarified that employees can change their coverage <br /> 104 during the year based on a qualifying life event. With the change to budget at the current <br /> . <br /> 05 coverage level, it was suggested that adding funding to the general contingency fund could help <br /> 106 provide for unexpected funding needs in the health care area. The council requested additional <br /> 107 information on the type of coverage the city offers to its employees; staff reminded the council <br /> 108 that the employee contribution is a negotiated item (for union employees). <br /> 109 The following proposal for the unbudgeted funds was suggested by a council member: <br /> 110 Add$37,500 to the street maintenance budget; <br /> 111 Do not use reserve funds in the amount of$93,377 as originally proposed; <br /> 112 Fund equipment replacement in the amount of$110,000; <br /> 113 Designate any remaining to the contingency. <br /> 114 The council discussed whether or not to include the proposed two-week employee furloughs in <br /> 115 the budget. It was pointed out that the furloughs are one-time savings, they are directly in <br /> 116 conflict with the concept of investing in people, and there are also pension implications. The <br /> 117 council decided to leave the two-week furlough in the budget but with the understanding that <br /> 118 employees should take no more than one week in the first half of 2010 and that the council is <br /> 119 committed to making removal of the second week the first action if other budget cutting methods <br /> 120 are determined. <br /> 121 The council will continue consideration of the 2010 budget immediately in January. Staff is <br /> 122 encouraged to begin reviewing any and all ideas (staff and council) for budget savings as soon as <br /> ,23 possible. <br /> 3 <br />