Misc Backlog - 10/23/1989 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

district. The minimum lot size in that district for newly created parcels is 2 1/2 acres. Neither of the two parcels meets that requirement either before or after the proposed minor subdivision. A variance is required for creation of undersized parcels. No park dedication is required as no new buildable parcels are being created. In theory anyway the owners could have sold off the eastern part of their property for a dwelling as it meets the requirements of having a separate legal description, i.e. it's a lot of record. Professional Opinion: It might be argued that by reducing the vacant parcel from 255 feet to 230 feet, the city would create a situation where the vacant land could be subdivided into only two 80 foot wide parcels instead of three. This would not be good use of the land for either the city or the landowner. The other side of the coin is that some might must be given to the present situation and that changing the dimensions of the parcels works to "legalize reality." In addition it could be argued that "the two -of -three rule" could be applied to create three future lots measuring 76.6 x 202 feet. My recommendation is to recognize the real world and accommodate it. Recommended Action: Motion to recommend to the city council approval of a minor subdivision for Brad and Helen Elledge for property located at 7790 Lake Drive, Application #89-48. Motion to recommend to the city council approval of a variance, Application #89-49 for Brad and Helen Elledge to create an undersized lot in a suburban residential zoning district; incorporating a existing drainfield, existing kennel, and existing accessory building with the property on which the dwelling (principal structure) is located.